Abituzumab combined with cetuximab plus irinotecan versus cetuximab plus irinotecan alone for patients with KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: the randomised phase I/II POSEIDON trial
- PMID: 25319061
- DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdu474
Abituzumab combined with cetuximab plus irinotecan versus cetuximab plus irinotecan alone for patients with KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: the randomised phase I/II POSEIDON trial
Abstract
Background: Integrins are involved in tumour progression and metastasis, and differentially expressed on colorectal cancer (CRC) cells. Abituzumab (EMD 525797), a humanised monoclonal antibody targeting integrin αν heterodimers, has demonstrated preclinical activity. This trial was designed to assess the tolerability of different doses of abituzumab in combination with cetuximab and irinotecan (phase I) and explore the efficacy and tolerability of the combination versus that of cetuximab and irinotecan in patients with metastatic CRC (mCRC) (phase II part).
Methods: Eligible patients had KRAS (exon 2) wild-type mCRC and had received prior oxaliplatin-containing therapy. The trial comprised an initial safety run-in using abituzumab doses up to 1000 mg combined with a standard of care (SoC: cetuximab plus irinotecan) and a phase II part in which patients were randomised 1 : 1 : 1 to receive abituzumab 500 mg (arm A) or 1000 mg (arm B) every 2 weeks combined with SoC, or SoC alone (arm C). The primary end point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end points included overall survival (OS), response rate (RR) and tolerability. Associations between tumour integrin expression and outcomes were also assessed.
Results: Phase I showed that abituzumab doses up to 1000 mg were well tolerated in combination with SoC. Seventy-three (arm A), 71 (arm B) and 72 (arm C) patients were randomised to the phase II part. Baseline characteristics were balanced. PFS was similar in the three arms: arm A versus SoC, hazard ratio (HR) 1.13 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.78-1.64]; arm B versus SoC, HR 1.11 (95% CI 0.77-1.61). RRs were also similar. A trend toward improved OS was observed: arm A versus SoC, HR 0.83 (95% CI 0.54-1.28); arm B versus SoC, HR 0.80 (95% CI 0.52-1.25). Grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events were observed in 72%, 78% and 67% of patients. High tumour integrin αvβ6 expression was associated with longer OS in arms A [HR 0.55 (0.30-1.00)] and B [HR 0.41 (0.21-0.81)] than in arm C.
Conclusion: The primary PFS end point was not met, although predefined exploratory biomarker analyses identified subgroups of patients in whom abituzumab may have benefit. The tolerability of abituzumab combined with cetuximab and irinotecan was acceptable. Further study is warranted. CLINICALTRIALS.GOV IDENTIFIER: NCT01008475.
Keywords: abituzumab; biomarker; colorectal cancer; integrin; monoclonal antibody; phase I/II.
© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Similar articles
-
Biweekly cetuximab plus irinotecan as second-line chemotherapy for patients with irinotecan-refractory and KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer according to epidermal growth factor receptor expression status.Invest New Drugs. 2012 Aug;30(4):1607-13. doi: 10.1007/s10637-011-9703-8. Epub 2011 Jun 25. Invest New Drugs. 2012. PMID: 21706149 Clinical Trial.
-
Second-line cetuximab/irinotecan versus oxaliplatin/fluoropyrimidines for metastatic colorectal cancer with wild-type KRAS.Cancer Sci. 2013 Apr;104(4):473-80. doi: 10.1111/cas.12098. Epub 2013 Feb 14. Cancer Sci. 2013. PMID: 23298313 Free PMC article.
-
Cetuximab plus capecitabine and irinotecan compared with cetuximab plus capecitabine and oxaliplatin as first-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: AIO KRK-0104--a randomized trial of the German AIO CRC study group.J Clin Oncol. 2011 Mar 10;29(8):1050-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.31.1936. Epub 2011 Feb 7. J Clin Oncol. 2011. PMID: 21300933 Clinical Trial.
-
Progress in metastatic colorectal cancer: growing role of cetuximab to optimize clinical outcome.Clin Transl Oncol. 2010 Aug;12(8):533-42. doi: 10.1007/s12094-010-0551-3. Clin Transl Oncol. 2010. PMID: 20709651 Review.
-
Cetuximab/irinotecan-chemotherapy in KRAS wild-type pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer: a pooled analysis and review of literature.Rev Recent Clin Trials. 2013 Jun;8(2):101-9. doi: 10.2174/15748871113089990042. Rev Recent Clin Trials. 2013. PMID: 23859115 Review.
Cited by
-
Molecular subtypes of colorectal cancer in the era of precision oncotherapy: Current inspirations and future challenges.Cancer Med. 2024 Jul;13(14):e70041. doi: 10.1002/cam4.70041. Cancer Med. 2024. PMID: 39054866 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Extracellular Matrices and Cancer-Associated Fibroblasts: Targets for Cancer Diagnosis and Therapy?Cancers (Basel). 2021 Jul 11;13(14):3466. doi: 10.3390/cancers13143466. Cancers (Basel). 2021. PMID: 34298680 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Discovery of a new class of integrin antibodies for fibrosis.Sci Rep. 2021 Jan 22;11(1):2118. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-81253-0. Sci Rep. 2021. PMID: 33483531 Free PMC article.
-
A Small Molecule-Drug Conjugate (SMDC) Consisting of a Modified Camptothecin Payload Linked to an αVß3 Binder for the Treatment of Multiple Cancer Types.Cancers (Basel). 2022 Jan 13;14(2):391. doi: 10.3390/cancers14020391. Cancers (Basel). 2022. PMID: 35053556 Free PMC article.
-
Ongoing clinical trials and treatment options for patients with systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease.Rheumatology (Oxford). 2019 Apr 1;58(4):567-579. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/key151. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2019. PMID: 29893938 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous