Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2014 Dec;8(4):321-7.
doi: 10.1097/SPC.0000000000000091.

Role of interleukin-6 in cachexia: therapeutic implications

Affiliations
Review

Role of interleukin-6 in cachexia: therapeutic implications

Aditi A Narsale et al. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care. 2014 Dec.

Abstract

Purpose of review: Interleukin-6 (IL-6) has emerged as a cytokine involved in cachexia progression with some cancers. This review will present the recent breakthroughs in animal models and humans related to targeting IL-6 as a cancer cachexia therapy.

Recent findings: IL-6 can target adipose, skeletal muscle, gut, and liver tissue, which can all affect cachectic patient recovery. IL-6 trans-signaling through the soluble IL-6R has the potential to amplify IL-6 signaling in the cachectic patient. In the skeletal muscle, chronic IL-6 exposure induces proteasome and autophagy protein degradation pathways that lead to wasting. IL-6 is also indirectly associated with AMP-activated kinase (AMPK) and nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) activation. Several mouse cancer models have clearly demonstrated that blocking IL-6 and associated signaling can attenuate cachexia progression. Additionally, pharmaceuticals targeting IL-6 and associated signaling can relieve some cachectic symptoms in cancer patients. Research with cachectic mice has demonstrated that exercise and nutraceutical administration can interact with chronic IL-6 signaling during cachexia progression.

Summary: IL-6 remains a promising therapeutic strategy for attenuating cachexia progression with many types of cancer. However, improvement of this treatment will require a better understanding of the indirect and direct effects of IL-6 as well as its tissue-specific actions in the cancer patient.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. IL-6 signaling and its downstream targets in skeletal muscle
The IL-6/IL-6R complex or IL6/sIL-6R complex can signal through the membrane bound gp130 receptor to activate both the STAT-3 and ERK cascade (Direct targets in gray). Activation of the IL – 6 signaling cascade leads to the activation of various proliferative, anti-inflammatory and anti – apoptotic, and inflammatory genes downstream. Indirect targets (In Black) of IL – 6 include AMPK and NF – kB which are upregulated with IL -6 induced cachexia in vivo, however these cannot be attenuated by IL – 6 inhibitors. Pre – clinical trials have tested antibodies against the IL – 6 receptor and various inhibitors for the JAK/STAT-3 signaling to study the effect of IL – 6 on cachexia progression. Based on these studies currently antibodies against IL -6 (ALD518 and siltuximab) and its receptor (Tocilizumab) are being tested for attenuation of cachexia in patients. The black arrows ending in a circle represent inhibitory pathways. The gray arrow ending in a “V” represent activation pathways
Figure 2
Figure 2. Representative figure demonstrating the systemic effect of IL - 6 dependent cachexia in vivo
IL - 6 source mainly from the tumor and immune cells like macrophages affects various organs like adipose, muscle liver and gut with contrasting effects. Adipose tissue undergoes rapid lipolysis under chronic IL-6 conditions [6, 13, 19]. Muscle demonstrates activation of inflammatory and degradation pathways with a suppression of protein synthesis signaling. The liver demonstrates hypertrophy, an upregulation of innate inflammatory pathways, with a possible suppression of adaptive responses and disruption in lipid signaling. The gut is affected by chronic IL - 6 exposure with increased gut permeability possible due to a disruption in tight junction proteins and anemia. Both increased gut permeability and liver dysfunction may contribute to endotoxemia seen in the later stages of cachexia. Abbreviations: TJ = Tight junctions, APR = Acute Phase Response, VLDL = Very low density lipoproteins. Images in the figure were downloaded and adapted from an online image library: dreamstime royaltyfree stock photos. http://www.dreamstime.com/photos-images.html.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Fearon KC, Glass DJ, Guttridge DC. Cancer cachexia: mediators, signaling, and metabolic pathways. Cell Metab. 2012 Aug 8;16(2):153–66. - PubMed
    1. Onesti JK, Guttridge DC. Inflammation Based Regulation of Cancer Cachexia. Biomed Res Int. 2014 168407. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ando K, Takahashi F, Motojima S, et al. Possible role for tocilizumab, an anti-interleukin-6 receptor antibody, in treating cancer cachexia. J Clin Oncol. 2013 Feb 20;31(6):e69–72. - PubMed
    1. Gallagher IJ, Stephens NA, MacDonald AJ, et al. Suppression of skeletal muscle turnover in cancer cachexia: evidence from the transcriptome in sequential human muscle biopsies. Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research. 2012 May 15;18(10):2817–27. Research Support, Non-U.S Gov’t. - PubMed
    1. Laine A, Iyengar P, Pandita TK. The role of inflammatory pathways in cancer-associated cachexia and radiation resistance. Mol Cancer Res. 2013 Sep;11(9):967–72. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types