Subjective discomfort in children receiving 3 T MRI and experienced adults' perspective on children's tolerability of 7 T: a cross-sectional questionnaire survey
- PMID: 25320001
- PMCID: PMC4201995
- DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006094
Subjective discomfort in children receiving 3 T MRI and experienced adults' perspective on children's tolerability of 7 T: a cross-sectional questionnaire survey
Abstract
Objectives: To explore the possible discomfort perceived by children participating in 7 T MRI research, and the age range in which children are most likely to tolerate it well.
Design: A cross-sectional survey using age-appropriate questionnaires containing six measures of subjective discomfort (general discomfort, dizziness, noisiness, claustrophobia and feeling of cold or warm).
Setting: For children, 3 T clinical scanner in a tertiary referral teaching hospital; for adults, 3 and 7 T scanner in a university research building.
Participants: Non-sedated children and young people under 18 years of age who underwent 3 T clinical MRI for brain or musculoskeletal scans and adult volunteers attending 7 T with or without 3 T for brain scans.
Results: 83% (89/107) of involved individuals returned questionnaires. The most common discomfort among 31 children receiving 3 T MRI was noisiness (39%), followed by cold (19%), general discomfort (16%), dizziness (13%) and claustrophobia (10%). The noise was reported more frequently in children younger than 12 years than those older (p=0.021). The most common discomfort for 58 adults receiving 7 T MRI was noisiness (43%). In adults, there was a higher frequency of general discomfort during 7 than 3 T scans (p=0.031). More than 85% of adult respondents thought children aged 12-17 years would tolerate 7 T scans well, but only 35% and 15% thought children aged 10-11 and 8-9 years, respectively, would.
Conclusions: Noisiness was the most common discomfort across all ages in 3 and 7 T scanners. Although general discomfort was more common during 7 than 3 T scans in adults, most adults thought children aged 12 years or more would tolerate 7 T MRI well. Cautious enrolment of children in 7 T MRI study is warranted, but until there is more evidence of how well those aged 12 years or more tolerate 7 T MRI, we would caution against enrolling younger children.
Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Subject tolerance of 7 T MRI examinations.J Magn Reson Imaging. 2013 Sep;38(3):722-5. doi: 10.1002/jmri.23904. Epub 2012 Nov 13. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2013. PMID: 23150466
-
Claustrophobia in MRI: the role of cognitions.Magn Reson Imaging. 2008 Oct;26(8):1081-8. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2008.01.022. Epub 2008 Jun 3. Magn Reson Imaging. 2008. PMID: 18524527
-
Patient-centric comparative analysis of experiences in open upright and conventional closed MRI scanners.Radiography (Lond). 2024 Aug;30(5):1258-1264. doi: 10.1016/j.radi.2024.06.021. Epub 2024 Jul 10. Radiography (Lond). 2024. PMID: 38991328
-
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 36321557 Free PMC article.
-
3 Tesla magnetic resonance imaging noise in standard head and neck sequence does not cause temporary threshold shift in high frequency.Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2015 Nov;272(11):3109-13. doi: 10.1007/s00405-014-3232-y. Epub 2014 Sep 10. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2015. PMID: 25205300 Review.
Cited by
-
Comparing the patient experience between a novel 360° gamma camera (VERITON-CT) and a conventional dual head gamma camera.J Nucl Med Technol. 2021 Nov 8;50(2):132-6. doi: 10.2967/jnmt.121.262627. Online ahead of print. J Nucl Med Technol. 2021. PMID: 34750232 Free PMC article.
-
Silent zero TE MR neuroimaging: Current state-of-the-art and future directions.Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc. 2021 Apr;123:73-93. doi: 10.1016/j.pnmrs.2021.03.002. Epub 2021 Mar 26. Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc. 2021. PMID: 34078538 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Ultra-High Field 7T MRI in a Drug-Resistant Pediatric Epilepsy Cohort: Image Comparison and Radiologic Outcomes.Neurology. 2025 Sep 9;105(5):e213921. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000213921. Epub 2025 Aug 20. Neurology. 2025. PMID: 40834340 Free PMC article.
-
Assessment of impacted and partially impacted lower third molars with panoramic radiography compared to MRI-a proof of principle study.Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2018 May;47(4):20170371. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20170371. Epub 2018 Feb 13. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2018. PMID: 29388826 Free PMC article.
-
Patient preferences for development in MRI scanner design: a survey of claustrophobic patients in a randomized study.Eur Radiol. 2021 Mar;31(3):1325-1335. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-07060-9. Epub 2020 Sep 2. Eur Radiol. 2021. PMID: 32876831 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
References
-
- Haddad AD, Platt B, James AC, et al. . Anxious and non-anxious adolescents’ experiences of non-clinical magnetic resonance imaging research. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev 2013;44:556–60 - PubMed
-
- Marshall SP, Smith MS, Weinberger E. Perceived anxiety of pediatric patients to magnetic resonance. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 1995;34:59–60 - PubMed
-
- Tyc VL, Fairclough D, Fletcher B, et al. . Children's distress during magnetic resonance imaging procedures. Child Health Care 1995;24:5–19 - PubMed
-
- Cavin ID, Glover PM, Bowtell RW, et al. . Thresholds for perceiving metallic taste at high magnetic field. J Magn Reson Imaging 2007;26:1357–61 - PubMed
-
- Glover PM. Interaction of MRI field gradients with the human body. Phys Med Biol 2009;54:R99–R115 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical