The Austrian breast implant register: recent trends in implant-based breast surgery
- PMID: 25320030
- DOI: 10.1007/s00266-014-0407-2
The Austrian breast implant register: recent trends in implant-based breast surgery
Abstract
Introduction: Due to the fact that the number of breast implant surgeries for cosmetic and medical purposes is rising yearly, a discussion about the quality of service for both patients and physicians is more important than ever. To this end, we reviewed the Austrian Breast Implant Register with one specific question in mind: What are the trends?
Materials and methods: In the statistical analysis of the Austrian Breast Implant Register, we were able to identify 13,112 registered breast implants between 2004 and 2012. The whole dataset was then divided into medical and cosmetic groups. We focused on device size, surface characteristics, filling material, device placement and incision site. All factors were considered for all examined years.
Results: In summary, the most used device had a textured surface (97 %) and silicone gel as the filling material (93 %). The mean size of implants for the cosmetic group was 240 cc, placement was submuscular (58 %) and the incision site was inframammary (67 %). In the medical group, the mean size was 250 cc. Yearly registrations had their peak in 2008 (1,898 registered devices); from this year on, registrations decreased annually. A slight trend away from subglandular placement in the cosmetic group was noted. Also, the usage of implants with polyurethane surface characteristics has increased since 2008. The smooth surface implants had a peak usage in 2006 and their usage decreased steadily from then on whereas the textured surface was steady over the years.
Discussion and conclusion: Keeping the problems related to the quality of breast implants in mind, we could recommend an obligatory national register. Organisations of surgeons and governments should develop and establish these registers. Furthermore, an all-encompassing international register should be established by the European Union and the American FDA (Food and Drug Administration); this might be useful in comparing the individual country registers and also would help in delivering "evidence based" medicine in cosmetic and medical procedures.
Level of evidence v: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.
Similar articles
-
Breast augmentation with extra-projected and high-cohesive Dual-Gel Prosthesis 510: a prospective study of 75 consecutive cases for a new method (the Zenith system).Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2012 Aug;36(4):866-78. doi: 10.1007/s00266-012-9889-y. Epub 2012 Apr 7. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2012. PMID: 22484397
-
A simple method to inset and position polyurethane-covered breast implants.Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2014 Apr;38(2):365-8. doi: 10.1007/s00266-014-0285-7. Epub 2014 Mar 8. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2014. PMID: 24610108
-
Muscle-splitting, subglandular, and partial submuscular augmentation mammoplasties: a 12-year retrospective analysis of 2026 primary cases.Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2013 Apr;37(2):290-302. doi: 10.1007/s00266-012-0026-8. Epub 2013 Jan 26. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2013. PMID: 23354762
-
Primary breast augmentation clinical trial outcomes stratified by surgical incision, anatomical placement and implant device type.J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2013 Sep;66(9):1165-72. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2013.04.046. Epub 2013 May 9. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2013. PMID: 23664574 Review.
-
Silicone lymphadenopathy after breast augmentation: case reports, review of the literature, and current thoughts.Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2013 Apr;37(2):278-89. doi: 10.1007/s00266-012-0025-9. Epub 2013 Jan 26. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2013. PMID: 23354761 Review.
Cited by
-
Breast Implant-associated Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma Incidence: Determining an Accurate Risk.Ann Surg. 2020 Sep 1;272(3):403-409. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004179. Ann Surg. 2020. PMID: 32694446 Free PMC article.
-
Quantification of Breast Volume According to age and BMI: A Three-Dimensional MRI Analysis of 400 Women.Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2023 Oct;47(5):1713-1724. doi: 10.1007/s00266-022-03167-0. Epub 2022 Nov 23. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2023. PMID: 36418548
-
Textured vs. Smooth Breast Implants Using the Jones Criteria-What Is the Currently Available Evidence for BIA-ALCL?: A Systematic Review.J Pers Med. 2023 May 11;13(5):816. doi: 10.3390/jpm13050816. J Pers Med. 2023. PMID: 37240986 Free PMC article.
-
Long-term Insights: Histopathological Assessment of Polyurethane Implant Capsules Over 24 Years.Aesthet Surg J. 2024 Aug 20;44(9):915-924. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjae057. Aesthet Surg J. 2024. PMID: 38470860 Free PMC article.
-
Concentration of Povidone-Iodine Pocket Irrigation in Implant-Based Breast Surgery: A Scoping Review.Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2025 Jun;49(11):3067-3080. doi: 10.1007/s00266-025-04660-y. Epub 2025 Jan 23. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2025. PMID: 39849100 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials