Use of smoking cessation and quit support services by socioeconomic status over 10 years of the national drug strategy household survey
- PMID: 25320110
- DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntu119
Use of smoking cessation and quit support services by socioeconomic status over 10 years of the national drug strategy household survey
Abstract
Objectives: The aim of this research was to examine the use of quit smoking services and support options in Australia with national survey data to determine whether use of quit smoking services and pharmacotherapy contributes to socioeconomic status (SES) differences in smoking.
Methods: Analyses were performed with data from 4 waves of the Australian National Drug Strategy Household Survey between 2001 and 2010. The primary outcomes were the use of quit smoking services or pharmacotherapy. The main predictor variables used were measures of SES including the Socio-Economic Indexes for Areas, income, and education. Other sociodemographic variables were also examined.
Results: There was no systematic SES difference in the use of services or support options, with some used more by high SES and some used more by low SES. Those with university education (odds ratio [OR] = 0.72; 95% CI = 0.56-0.93) were less likely to use prescription medication. Conversely, those with higher incomes were more likely to use patches, gum, or an inhaler (OR = 1.13; 95% CI = 1.01-1.27). Prescription medication was significantly associated with increased odds for recent cessation, although only among those with lower levels of education (OR = 2.50; 95% CI = 1.94-3.23). Those with higher SES had the greatest odds for recent cessation.
Conclusions: The evidence suggests that low-SES smokers use quit services and support options equally compared with high-SES smokers; thus, access does not drive the SES differential in smoking. However, the findings are positive, suggesting that increasing the uptake of prescription medication may help increase cessation rates among low-SES smokers.
© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Comment in
-
The difference between rigor and specificity in examining methodologies for analyzing survey data: response to commentary.Nicotine Tob Res. 2014 Dec;16(12):1539-40. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntu189. Epub 2014 Sep 19. Nicotine Tob Res. 2014. PMID: 25239963 No abstract available.
-
Rigorous methodology is needed to analyze and interpret observational data on the use and effectiveness of smoking cessation AIDS.Nicotine Tob Res. 2014 Dec;16(12):1537-8. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntu142. Epub 2014 Oct 15. Nicotine Tob Res. 2014. PMID: 25320111 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
The relationship between socioeconomic status and 'hardcore' smoking over time--greater accumulation of hardened smokers in low-SES than high-SES smokers.Tob Control. 2014 Nov;23(e2):e133-8. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2013-051436. Epub 2014 Apr 4. Tob Control. 2014. PMID: 24706085
-
Socioeconomic disparities in quit intentions, quit attempts, and smoking abstinence among smokers in four western countries: findings from the International Tobacco Control Four Country Survey.Nicotine Tob Res. 2010 Oct;12 Suppl(Suppl 1):S20-33. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntq051. Nicotine Tob Res. 2010. PMID: 20889477 Free PMC article.
-
Tobacco use, smoking quit rates, and socioeconomic patterning among men and women: a cross-sectional survey in rural Andhra Pradesh, India.Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2014 Oct;21(10):1308-18. doi: 10.1177/2047487313491356. Epub 2013 May 30. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2014. PMID: 23723329
-
Socioeconomic status and smoking: a review.Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2012 Feb;1248:107-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06202.x. Epub 2011 Nov 17. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2012. PMID: 22092035 Review.
-
Understanding the multitude of barriers that prevent smokers in lower socioeconomic groups from accessing smoking cessation support: A literature review.Prev Med. 2019 Jun;123:143-151. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2019.03.029. Epub 2019 Mar 20. Prev Med. 2019. PMID: 30902700 Review.
Cited by
-
Impact of population tobacco control interventions on socioeconomic inequalities in smoking: a systematic review and appraisal of future research directions.Tob Control. 2020 Sep 29;30(e2):e87-95. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2020-055874. Online ahead of print. Tob Control. 2020. PMID: 32994297 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Tailored text-messaging versus standard Quitline telephone counselling for smoking cessation among people who smoke from a low-socio-economic status background in Australia: A study protocol for a non-inferiority randomized controlled trial (The Quit By Phone Study).Addiction. 2025 Jan;120(1):174-183. doi: 10.1111/add.16662. Epub 2024 Sep 16. Addiction. 2025. PMID: 39279642 Free PMC article.
-
Electronic nicotine devices to aid smoking cessation by alcohol- and drug-dependent clients: protocol for a pilot randomised controlled trial.Trials. 2018 Aug 2;19(1):415. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2786-1. Trials. 2018. PMID: 30071863 Free PMC article.
-
A population-level analysis of changes in Australian smokers' preferences for smoking cessation support over two decades - from 1998 to 2017.Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2021 Dec 13;19:100342. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2021.100342. eCollection 2022 Feb. Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2021. PMID: 35024667 Free PMC article.
-
Differences in the effectiveness of individual-level smoking cessation interventions by socioeconomic status.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jan 27;1(1):CD015120. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015120.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025. PMID: 39868569
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical