Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Oct 15;21(11):575-9.
doi: 10.1101/lm.036079.114. Print 2014 Nov.

Visualization of plasticity in fear-evoked calcium signals in midbrain dopamine neurons

Affiliations

Visualization of plasticity in fear-evoked calcium signals in midbrain dopamine neurons

Bryan B Gore et al. Learn Mem. .

Abstract

Dopamine is broadly implicated in fear-related processes, yet we know very little about signaling dynamics in these neurons during active fear conditioning. We describe the direct imaging of calcium signals of dopamine neurons during Pavlovian fear conditioning using fiber-optic confocal microscopy coupled with the genetically encoded calcium indicator GCaMP3. We observed calcium transients in a subset of dopamine neurons to an unconditioned fear stimulus on the first day of Pavlovian fear conditioning. On the second day, calcium transients occurred in response to conditioned and unconditioned stimuli. These results demonstrate plasticity in dopamine neuron calcium signals and the occurrence of activity-dependent processes in these neurons during fear conditioning.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Expression of GCaMP3 in dopamine neurons. (A) Schematic of AAV-FLEX-GCaMP3. (B) Schematic of viral injection to the midbrain. (C) Immunohistochemistry illustrating GCaMP3 colocalization with the dopamine neuron marker tyrosine hydroxylase (TH). Scale = 100 μm. Note: GCaMP3 expression is largely restricted to the medial aspect (VTA) of the ventral midbrain. (D) Average action potential waveforms for VTA neurons transduced (green) or untransduced (blue) with AAV-FLEX-GCaMP3 (scale, 2 msec, 20 mV). (E) Average waveform properties of untransduced (n = 6) and transduced (n = 7) cells in D. (F) The average firing rate of transduced and untransduced neurons in the VTA. Data are presented as mean ± SEM.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Characterization of activity-dependent GCaMP3 fluorescence in brain slice. (A) Illustration of individual fiber bundles comprising the field of view (scale 40 µm). (Inset) Higher magnification demonstrating individual fiber-optic arrangements within the probe (scale 10 µm). Characterization as a single cell requires detection by a minimum of four fibers, or an average diameter of 6 µm. (B) Jet pseudocolor fiber-optic image of dopamine neurons in an acute slice following NMDA application. White circles highlight individual cells. (C) High magnification view of cell in (B) indicated by arrow during baseline (top), muscimol (middle), and NMDA (bottom). White dots illustrate the center of individual fibers and circles represent ROI used for analysis (scale = 10 µm). (D) The change in fluorescence observed following bath application of muscimol and NMDA (blue, WF = wide-field, n = 7; green FO = fiber optic, n = 19). Arrows indicate the time of application. Data are presented as mean ± SEM. (E) WF fluorescence image of GCaMP3 expressing dopamine neuron illustrating patch electrode placement (dashed lines) to record action potential generation during imaging (scale 10 µm). (F) Average traces of stimulated action potentials recorded during imaging (three trials). Scale = 20 mV, 250 msec. (G) Change in GCaMP3 fluorescence observed following action potential stimulation using WF (top, n = 7 for 10 spikes and n = 19 for both 5 spikes and burst) or FO microscopy (bottom, n = 34 for 10 spikes, and n = 28 for both 5 spikes and burst). Scale = 1%DF/F, 2 sec. (H) Average latency to onset of fluorescence intensity change following action potential stimulation measured using FO or WF fluorescence microscopy. (I) Average duration of fluorescence change following action potential stimulation. (J) Average peak fluorescence intensity change. Data are presented as mean ± SEM.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Characterization of calcium signals in dopamine neurons during fear conditioning. (A) Image of fiber-optic probe (left) and cannula (right). Scale (5 mm). (B) Image of mouse in conditioning chamber showing fiber-optic/cannula assembly. (C) Image of GCaMP3 fluorescence in VTA obtained by the fiber optic in vivo on second day of fear conditioning (scale 20 µm), (left) four cells (colored circles correspond to graph in (D); (right) fluorescence of a single cell during baseline (top), immediately after CS+ (middle), and immediately after shock (bottom). (D) Fluorescence signal acquired from four cells in (C) during a single trial on the second day of conditioning; red line is the cell in the right panels in (C). (E) Percent time mobile on Day 1 of paired trials (Bonferroni post hoc [**] P < 0.01, [***] P < 0.001). (F) Percent time mobile on Day 2 of paired trials. (Bonferroni post hoc [***] P < 0.001, [****] P < 0.0001.) (G) Percent time mobile on Day 1 of unpaired trials. (H) Percent time mobile on Day 2 of unpaired trials. (I) Average change in fluorescence observed during Day 1 of conditioning in CS+ (red) and CS− (blue) trials. Insets are average CuSums of cells responding to the US during CS presentation (left, red CS+ trials, blue CS− trials) or US presentation (right, red CS+ trials, blue CS− trials); x-axis: time (sec), 2 sec prior and 2 sec following stimulus; y-axis: cumulative summation of fluorescence signal. (J) Average change in fluorescence observed during Day 2 of conditioning in CS+ (red) and CS− (blue) trials. Insets are average CuSums of cells responding to the US during CS presentation (left, red CS+ trials, blue CS− trials) or US presentation (right, red CS+ trials, blue CS− trials). (K) Average change in fluorescence observed during Day 1 of conditioning with unpaired CS+ (red) and CS− (blue). Insets are average CuSums of all cells. (L) Average change in fluorescence observed during Day 2 of conditioning with unpaired CS+ (red) and CS− (blue). Insets are average CuSums of all cells. (M) Average normalized percent change in fluorescence during CS+ (red) and CS− (blue) trials on Day 1. (N) Average normalized percent change in fluorescence during US (red), or corresponding time in CS− (blue) trials on Day 1 (Bonferroni post hoc [*] P < 0.05; time: 0.833–2.417 sec). (O) Average normalized percent change in fluorescence during CS+ (red) and CS− (blue) trials on Day 2 (Bonferroni post hoc [*] P < 0.05; time: 1.083–1.833 sec). (P) Average normalized percent change in fluorescence during US (red), or corresponding time in CS− (blue) trials on Day 2 (Bonferroni post hoc [**] P < 0.01; time: 1.417–3.833 sec).

References

    1. Badrinarayan A, Wescott SA, Vander Weele CM, Saunders BT, Couturier BE, Maren S, Aragona BJ. 2012. Aversive stimuli differentially modulate real-time dopamine transmission dynamics within the nucleus accumbens core and shell. J Neurosci 32: 15779–15790 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bonci A, Malenka RC. 1999. Properties and plasticity of excitatory synapses on dopaminergic and GABAergic cells in the ventral tegmental area. J Neurosci 19: 3723–3730 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brischoux F, Chakraborty S, Brierley DI, Ungless MA. 2009. Phasic excitation of dopamine neurons in ventral VTA by noxious stimuli. Proc Natl Acad Sci 106: 4894–4899 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bromberg-Martin ES, Matsumoto M, Hikosaka O. 2010. Dopamine in motivational control: rewarding, aversive, and alerting. Neuron 68: 815–834 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chiodo LA, Caggiula AR, Antelman SM, Lineberry CG. 1979. Reciprocal influences of activating and immobilizing stimuli on the activity of nigrostriatal dopamine neurons. Brain Res 176: 385–390 - PubMed

Publication types