Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2014 Oct 14;20(38):13681-91.
doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i38.13681.

Screening for and surveillance of gastric cancer

Debora Compare  1 , Alba Rocco  1 , Gerardo Nardone  1
Affiliations
Review

Screening for and surveillance of gastric cancer

Debora Compare et al. World J Gastroenterol. .

Abstract

Although the prevalence of gastric cancer (GC) progressively decreased during the last decades, due to improved dietary habit, introduction of food refrigeration and recovered socio-economic level, it still accounts for 10% of the total cancer-related deaths. The best strategy to reduce the mortality for GC is to schedule appropriate screening and surveillance programs, that rises many relevant concerns taking into account its worldwide variability, natural history, diagnostic tools, therapeutic strategies, and cost-effectiveness. Intestinal-type, the most frequent GC histotype, develops through a multistep process triggered by Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) and progressing from gastritis to atrophy, intestinal metaplasia (IM), and dysplasia. However, the majority of patients infected with H. pylori and carrying premalignant lesions do not develop GC. Therefore, it remains unclear who should be screened, when the screening should be started and how the screening should be performed. It seems reasonable that screening programs should target the general population in eastern countries, at high prevalence of GC and the high-risk subjects in western countries, at low prevalence of GC. As far as concern surveillance, currently, we are lacking of standardized international recommendations and many features have to be defined regarding the optimal diagnostic approach, the patients at higher risk, the best timing and the cost-effectiveness. Anyway, patients with corpus atrophic gastritis, extensive incomplete IM and dysplasia should enter a surveillance program. At present, screening and surveillance programs need further studies to draw worldwide reliable recommendations and evaluate the impact on mortality for GC.

Keywords: Gastric atrophy; Gastric cancer; Gastric dysplasia; Helicobacter pylori; Intestinal metaplasia; Preneoplastic lesions; Screening; Surveillance.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
“Hypothetical” screening program for gastric cancer according to geographic area and individual risk. H. pylori: Helicobacter pylori; PG: Pepsinogen.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Surveillance protocol of gastric precancerous lesions according to the guidelines of a recent International Consensus Project[99].
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, Pisani P. Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin. 2005;55:74–108. - PubMed
    1. UK National Screening Committee (2003) Criteria for appraising the viability, effectiveness and appropriateness of a screening programme. Accessed May 20, 2009. Available from: http://www.nsc.nhs.uk/pdfs/criteria.pdf.
    1. Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011;61:69–90. - PubMed
    1. Correa P, Piazuelo MB, Camargo MC. The future of gastric cancer prevention. Gastric Cancer. 2004;7:9–16. - PubMed
    1. Crew KD, Neugut AI. Epidemiology of gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2006;12:354–362. - PMC - PubMed