Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Feb;58(1):151-62.
doi: 10.1044/2014_JSLHR-H-13-0259.

Verbal processing speed and executive functioning in long-term cochlear implant users

Angela M AuBuchon, David B Pisoni, William G Kronenberger

Verbal processing speed and executive functioning in long-term cochlear implant users

Angela M AuBuchon et al. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2015 Feb.

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to report how verbal rehearsal speed (VRS), a form of covert speech used to maintain verbal information in working memory, and another verbal processing speed measure, perceptual encoding speed, are related to 3 domains of executive function (EF) at risk in cochlear implant (CI) users: verbal working memory, fluency-speed, and inhibition-concentration.

Method: EF, speech perception, and language outcome measures were obtained from 55 prelingually deaf, long-term CI users and matched controls with normal hearing (NH controls). Correlational analyses were used to assess relations between VRS (articulation rate), perceptual encoding speed (digit and color naming), and the outcomes in each sample.

Results: CI users displayed slower verbal processing speeds than NH controls. Verbal rehearsal speed was related to 2 EF domains in the NH sample but was unrelated to EF outcomes in CI users. Perceptual encoding speed was related to all EF domains in both groups.

Conclusions: Verbal rehearsal speed may be less influential for EF quality in CI users than for NH controls, whereas rapid automatized labeling skills and EF are closely related in both groups. CI users may develop processing strategies in EF tasks that differ from the covert speech strategies routinely employed by NH individuals.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Anderson P. (2002). Assessment and development of executive function (EF) during childhood. Child Neuropsychology, 8, 71–82. doi:10.1076/chin.8.2.71.8724 - PubMed
    1. Awh E., Jonides J., Smith E. E., Schumacher E. H., Koeppe R. A., & Katz S. (1996). Dissociation of storage and rehearsal in verbal working memory: Evidence from positron emission tomography. Psychological Science, 7, 25–31.
    1. Baddeley A., & Hitch G. (1974). Working memory. In Bower G. H. (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (pp. 47–89). New York, NY: Academic Press.
    1. Baddeley A., Thompson N., & Buchanan M. (1975). Word length and the structure of short-term memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14, 575–589.
    1. Barkley R. A. (2012). Executive functions: What they are, how they work, and why they evolved. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

Publication types