Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2014 Oct 16:15:399.
doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-399.

Interventions to improve recruitment and retention in clinical trials: a survey and workshop to assess current practice and future priorities

Affiliations
Review

Interventions to improve recruitment and retention in clinical trials: a survey and workshop to assess current practice and future priorities

Peter Bower et al. Trials. .

Abstract

Background: Despite significant investment in infrastructure many trials continue to face challenges in recruitment and retention. We argue that insufficient focus has been placed on the development and testing of recruitment and retention interventions.

Methods: In this current paper, we summarize existing reviews about interventions to improve recruitment and retention. We report survey data from Clinical Trials Units in the United Kingdom to indicate the range of interventions used by these units to encourage recruitment and retention. We present the views of participants in a recent workshop and a priority list of recruitment interventions for evaluation (determined by voting among workshop participants). We also discuss wider issues concerning the testing of recruitment interventions.

Results: Methods used to encourage recruitment and retention were categorized as: patient contact, patient convenience, support for recruiters, monitoring and systems, incentives, design, resources, and human factors. Interventions felt to merit investigation by respondents fell into three categories: training site staff, communication with patients, and incentives.

Conclusions: Significant resources continue to be invested into clinical trials and other high quality studies, but recruitment remains a significant challenge. Adoption of innovative methods to develop, test, and implement recruitment interventions are required.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Department of Health . Best Research for Best Health - A New National Health Research Strategy. London: Department of Health; 2006. - PubMed
    1. McDonald A, Knight R, Campbell M, Entwistle V, Grant A, Cook J, Elbourne D, Francis D, Garcia J, Roberts I, McDonald A, Knight R, Campbell M, Entwistle V, Grant A, Cook J, Elbourne D, Francis D, Garcia J, Roberts I, Snowdon C. What influences recruitment to randomized controlled trials? A review of trials funded by two UK funding agencies. Trials. 2006;7:9. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-7-9. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bower P, Wilson S, Mathers N. How often do UK primary care trials face recruitment delays? Fam Pract. 2007;24:601–603. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmm051. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Darbyshire J. The UK Clinical Research Network - building a world-class infrastructure for clinical research. Rheumatology. 2008;47:745. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/ken112. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sully B, Julious S, Nicholl J. A reinvestigation of recruitment to randomized, controlled, multicenter trials: a review of trials funded by two UK funding agencies. Trials. 2013;14:166. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-166. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types