Methodological comments: McFarlane et al
- PMID: 25323580
- PMCID: PMC4266303
- DOI: 10.1093/schbul/sbu139
Methodological comments: McFarlane et al
Abstract
Does the McFarlane et al study provide a model for practical trials? Unfortunately, not. The methodological problems are here reviewed and used as a springboard to set out methodological criteria that might define such a model.
Keywords: criteria; methodology; practical trials.
© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Maryland Psychiatric Research Center. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Figures

Comment on
-
Clinical and functional outcomes after 2 years in the early detection and intervention for the prevention of psychosis multisite effectiveness trial.Schizophr Bull. 2015 Jan;41(1):30-43. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbu108. Epub 2014 Jul 26. Schizophr Bull. 2015. PMID: 25065017 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
References
-
- Freedman B. Equipoise and the ethics of clinical research. N Engl J Med. 1987;317:141–145. - PubMed
-
- Lieberman JA, Stroup TS, McEvoy JP, et al. ; Clinical Antipsychotic Trials of Intervention Effectiveness (CATIE) Investigators. Effectiveness of antipsychotic drugs in patients with chronic schizophrenia. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:1209–1223. - PubMed
-
- Kraemer HC. Discovering, comparing, and combining moderators of treatment on outcome after randomized clinical trials: a parametric approach. Stat Med. 2013;32:1964–1973. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical