Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Oct 10;12(1):17.
doi: 10.1186/1617-9625-12-17. eCollection 2014.

Initial puffing behaviors and subjective responses differ between an electronic nicotine delivery system and traditional cigarettes

Affiliations

Initial puffing behaviors and subjective responses differ between an electronic nicotine delivery system and traditional cigarettes

Kaila J Norton et al. Tob Induc Dis. .

Abstract

Background: Electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) present an emerging issue for tobacco control and data on product use behaviors are limited.

Methods: Participants (N = 38 enrolled; N = 16 compliant) completed three lab visits over 5 days and were asked to abstain from regular cigarettes for 72 hours in favor of ENDS (Smoke 51 TRIO - 3 piece, First Generation with 11 mg/ml filters). Lab visits included measurement of exhaled carbon monoxide (CO) and salivary cotinine concentration, questionnaire measures of regular cigarette craving after the 72 hour abstinence, and subjective product effects. Participants used a topography device to record puff volume, duration, flow rate, and inter-puff interval.

Results: Analyses revealed significant differences across products in puff count, average volume, total volume and inter-puff interval, with ENDS broadly showing a more intensive smoking pattern. Cigarette craving scores dropped significantly after smoking regular cigarettes, but not ENDS (p = .001), and subjective measures showed ENDS rated less favorably. CO boost, after ENDS use, decreased significantly (p < .001), and saliva cotinine significantly dropped between visits 1 and 3 (p < 0.001) after ENDS use relative to after cigarette smoking. For compliant and non-compliant participants, there was an average 82.0% [V1 - 16.1 cpd; V3 - 2.9 cpd] and average 73.9% [V1 - 20.3 cpd; V3 - 5.3 cpd] reduction in regular cigarette use per day during the ENDS trial period, respectively.

Conclusions: The ENDS were smoked more intensively than own brand cigarettes, but delivered significantly less nicotineand were less satisfying. These findings have implications for the viability of certain ENDS as alternatives to cigarettes.

Keywords: Behavior; Smoking; Subjective effects.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart of study participation.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Mean values of questionnaire of smoking urges factor 1 (a) and factor 2 (b) before and after smoking cigarettes and using ENDS.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Mean values for cigarette evaluation scale items after smoking cigarettes and using ENDS.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Etter JF, Bullen C, Flouris AD, Laugesen M, Eissenberg T. Electronic nicotine delivery systems: a research agenda. Tob Control. 2011;20:243–248. doi: 10.1136/tc.2010.042168. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Trtchounian A, Williams M, Talbot P. Conventional and electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) have different smoking characteristics. Nicotine Tob Res. 2010;12:905–912. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntq114. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Trtchounian A, Talbot P. Electronic nicotine delivery systems: is there a need for regulation? Tob Control. 2011;20:47–52. doi: 10.1136/tc.2010.037259. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Westenberger BJ. Evaluation of e-cigarettes. St. Louis: US Food and Drug Administration, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research. 2009. http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/ScienceResearch/UCM173250.pdf.
    1. Uchiyama S, Inaba Y, Kunugita N. Determination of acrolein and other carbonyls in cigarette smoke using coupled silica cartridges impregnated with hydroquinone and 2,4-dinitophenylhydrazine. J Chromatogr A. 2010;1217:4383–4388. doi: 10.1016/j.chroma.2010.04.056. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources