Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Oct 1:8:328.
doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00328. eCollection 2014.

Enhanced discriminative fear learning of phobia-irrelevant stimuli in spider-fearful individuals

Affiliations

Enhanced discriminative fear learning of phobia-irrelevant stimuli in spider-fearful individuals

Carina Mosig et al. Front Behav Neurosci. .

Abstract

Avoidance is considered as a central hallmark of all anxiety disorders. The acquisition and expression of avoidance, which leads to the maintenance and exacerbation of pathological fear is closely linked to Pavlovian and operant conditioning processes. Changes in conditionability might represent a key feature of all anxiety disorders but the exact nature of these alterations might vary across different disorders. To date, no information is available on specific changes in conditionability for disorder-irrelevant stimuli in specific phobia (SP). The first aim of this study was to investigate changes in fear acquisition and extinction in spider-fearful individuals as compared to non-fearful participants by using the de novo fear conditioning paradigm. Secondly, we aimed to determine whether differences in the magnitude of context-dependent fear retrieval exist between spider-fearful and non-fearful individuals. Our findings point to an enhanced fear discrimination in spider-fearful individuals as compared to non-fearful individuals at both the physiological and subjective level. The enhanced fear discrimination in spider-fearful individuals was neither mediated by increased state anxiety, depression, nor stress tension. Spider-fearful individuals displayed no changes in extinction learning and/or fear retrieval. Surprisingly, we found no evidence for context-dependent modulation of fear retrieval in either group. Here, we provide first evidence that spider-fearful individuals show an enhanced discriminative fear learning of phobia-irrelevant (de novo) stimuli. Our findings provide novel insights into the role of fear acquisition and expression for the development and maintenance of maladaptive responses in the course of SP.

Keywords: anxiety disorders; conditionability; differential fear conditioning; extinction; fear renewal; specific phobia; spider fear; virtual reality.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The experimental design of the context-dependent differential fear conditioning procedure. VR software was used for the operationalization of external context change during the phases of fear acquisition and extinction. Context 1 featured an apartment and context 2 showed a cafeteria. Participants were instructed to freely explore the VR contexts, which rotated in simultaneous correspondence to the participants’ head movements, so that they became fully immersed in the virtual context. The order of context presentation was matched across participants and counterbalanced during fear retrieval in contexts A (ret A) and B (ret B).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Mean differential (CS+ minus CS) valence ratings in the spider-fearful and non-fearful group are displayed after habituation (hab), acquisition (acq) in context A, extinction (ext) in context B, and fear retrieval in contexts A (ret A) and B (ret B). Error bars denote standard errors of the mean.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Mean differential UCS-expectancy ratings in the spider-fearful and non-fearful group are displayed after habituation (hab), acquisition (acq) in context A, extinction (ext) in context B, and fear retrieval in contexts A (ret A) and B (ret B). Error bars denote standard errors of the mean.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Differential (CS+ minus CS) SCRs for the spider-fearful and non-fearful group are shown separately for each trial of habituation (hab), acquisition (acq) in context A, extinction (ext) in context B and fear retrieval in contexts A (ret A) and B (ret B). Error bars denote standard errors of the mean.

References

    1. Alvarez R. P., Johnson L., Grillon C. (2007). Contextual-specificity of short-delay extinction in humans: renewal of fear-potentiated startle in a virtual environment. Learn. Mem. 14, 247–25310.1101/lm.493707 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Amir N., Foa E. B. (2001). “Cognitive biases in social phobia,” in From Social Anxiety to Social Phobia: Multiple Perspectives, eds Hofmann S. G., Dibartolo P. M. (Boston: Allyn and Bacon; ), 254–267
    1. Antony M. M., Bieling P. J., Cox B. J., Enns M. W., Swinson R. P. (1998). Psychometric properties of the 42-item and 21-item versions of the depression anxiety stress scales in clinical groups and a community sample. Psychol. Assess. 10, 176–18110.1037/1040-3590.10.2.176 - DOI
    1. Arnaudova I., Krypotos A. M., Effting M., Boddez Y., Kindt M., Beckers T. (2013). Individual differences in discriminatory fear learning under conditions of ambiguity: a vulnerability factor for anxiety disorders? Front. Psychol. 4:298.10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00298 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Beck K. D., Jiao X., Pang K. C., Servatius R. J. (2010). Vulnerability factors in anxiety determined through differences in active-avoidance behavior. Prog. Neuropsychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 34, 852–86010.1016/j.pnpbp.2010.03.036 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources