Respirable silica dust suppression during artificial stone countertop cutting
- PMID: 25326187
- PMCID: PMC4290629
- DOI: 10.1093/annhyg/meu083
Respirable silica dust suppression during artificial stone countertop cutting
Erratum in
-
Correction to: Respirable Silica Dust Suppression During Artificial Stone Countertop Cutting.Ann Work Expo Health. 2024 Jun 6;68(5):556. doi: 10.1093/annweh/wxae036. Ann Work Expo Health. 2024. PMID: 38696676 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Abstract
Purpose: To assess the relative efficacy of three types of controls in reducing respirable silica exposure during artificial stone countertop cutting with a handheld circular saw.
Approach: A handheld worm drive circular saw equipped with a diamond segmented blade was fitted with water supply to wet the blade as is typical. The normal wetted-blade condition was compared to (i) wetted-blade plus 'water curtain' spray and (ii) wetted-blade plus local exhaust ventilation (LEV). Four replicate 30-min trials of 6-mm deep, 3-mm wide cuts in artificial quartz countertop stone were conducted at each condition in a 24-m(3) unventilated tent. One dry cutting trial was also conducted for comparison. Respirable cyclone breathing zone samples were collected on the saw operator and analyzed gravimetrically for respirable mass and by X-ray diffraction for respirable quartz mass.
Results: Mean quartz content of the respirable dust was 58.5%. The ranges of 30-min mass and quartz task concentrations in mg m(-3) were as follows-wet blade alone: 3.54-7.51 and 1.87-4.85; wet blade + curtain: 1.81-5.97 and 0.92-3.41; and wet blade + LEV: 0.20-0.69 and <0.12-0.20. Dry cutting task concentrations were 69.6 mg m(-3) mass and 44.6 mg m(-3) quartz. There was a statistically significant difference (α = 0.05) between the wet blade + LEV and wet blade only conditions, but not between the wet blade + curtain and wet blade only conditions, for both respirable dust and respirable silica.
Conclusions: Sawing with a wetted blade plus LEV reduced mean respirable dust and quartz task exposures by a factor of 10 compared to the wet blade only condition. We were unable to show a statistically significant benefit of a water curtain in the ejection path, but the data suggested some respirable dust suppression.
Keywords: countertop cutting; engineering controls; respirable silica.
© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Occupational Hygiene Society.
Figures
References
-
- Bartoli D, Banchii B, Di Benedetti F, et al. (2012). Silicosis in employees in the processing of kitchen, bar and shop countertops made from quartz resin composite. Provisional results of the environmental and health survey conducted within the territory of USL 11 of Empoli in Tuscany among employees in the processing of quartz resin composite materials and review of the literature. Ital J Occup Environ Hyg; 3: 6.
-
- Beaudry C, Dion C, Gerin M, et al. (2013a). Report R-771: construction workers’ exposure to crystalline silica—literature review and analysis. Chemical substances and biological agents studies and research projects. Montreal, Canada: Institut de recherche, Robert-Sauvé en santé et en sécurité du travail (IRSST).
-
- Beaudry C, Lavoué J, Sauvé JF, et al. (2013b) Occupational exposure to silica in construction workers: a literature-based exposure database. J Occup Environ Hyg; 10: 71–7. - PubMed
-
- Garcia VC, Sanchez Gomez J, Romero Morillo J. (2011). Silicosis in quartz conglomerate workers. Arch Bronconeumol; 47: 6. - PubMed
-
- Kramer MR, Blanc PD, Fireman E, et al. (2012). Artificial stone silicosis disease among artificial stone workers. Chest; 142: 419–24. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
