Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Oct 18;106(11):dju284.
doi: 10.1093/jnci/dju284. Print 2014 Nov.

Projected outcomes using different nodule sizes to define a positive CT lung cancer screening examination

Affiliations

Projected outcomes using different nodule sizes to define a positive CT lung cancer screening examination

David S Gierada et al. J Natl Cancer Inst. .

Abstract

Background: Computed tomography (CT) screening for lung cancer has been associated with a high frequency of false positive results because of the high prevalence of indeterminate but usually benign small pulmonary nodules. The acceptability of reducing false-positive rates and diagnostic evaluations by increasing the nodule size threshold for a positive screen depends on the projected balance between benefits and risks.

Methods: We examined data from the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) to estimate screening CT performance and outcomes for scans with nodules above the 4mm NLST threshold used to classify a CT screen as positive. Outcomes assessed included screening results, subsequent diagnostic tests performed, lung cancer histology and stage distribution, and lung cancer mortality. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were calculated for the different nodule size thresholds. All statistical tests were two-sided.

Results: In 64% of positive screens (11598/18141), the largest nodule was 7 mm or less in greatest transverse diameter. By increasing the threshold, the percentages of lung cancer diagnoses that would have been missed or delayed and false positives that would have been avoided progressively increased, for example from 1.0% and 15.8% at a 5 mm threshold to 10.5% and 65.8% at an 8 mm threshold, respectively. The projected reductions in postscreening follow-up CT scans and invasive procedures also increased as the threshold was raised. Differences across nodules sizes for lung cancer histology and stage distribution were small but statistically significant. There were no differences across nodule sizes in survival or mortality.

Conclusion: Raising the nodule size threshold for a positive screen would substantially reduce false-positive CT screenings and medical resource utilization with a variable impact on screening outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Sensitivity and specificity using various nodule size thresholds to define a positive screen. Positive screens having no nodule 4mm or larger or nodules of unknown size were counted as positive for all thresholds. Sens = sensitivity; Spec = specificity.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Positive predictive value using various nodule size thresholds to define a positive screen. Positive screens having no nodule 4mm or larger or nodules of unknown size were counted as positive for all thresholds. PPV = positive predictive value.

Comment in

References

    1. Aberle DR, Berg CD, Black WC, et al. The national lung screening trial: Overview and study design. Radiology. 2011;258(1):243–253 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aberle DR, Adams AM, Berg CD, et al. Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(5):395–409 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Swensen SJ, Jett JR, Hartman TE, et al. Lung cancer screening with ct: Mayo clinic experience. Radiology. 2003;226(3):756–761 - PubMed
    1. Henschke CI, Yip R, Yankelevitz DF, Smith JP. Definition of a positive test result in computed tomography screening for lung cancer: A cohort study. Ann Intern Med. 2013;158(4):246–252 - PubMed
    1. MacMahon H, Austin JH, Gamsu G, et al. Guidelines for management of small pulmonary nodules detected on ct scans: A statement from the fleischner society. Radiology. 2005;237(2):395–400 - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms