Intrapartum transperineal ultrasound as a predictor of instrumentation difficulty with vacuum-assisted delivery in primiparous women
- PMID: 25327175
- DOI: 10.3109/14767058.2014.976547
Intrapartum transperineal ultrasound as a predictor of instrumentation difficulty with vacuum-assisted delivery in primiparous women
Abstract
Objectives: To assess the capability of different intrapartum transperineal ultrasound parameters to predict the difficulty of vacuum extraction. This is a prospective observational study performed between 04/2012 and 03/2013 on 72 primiparous-women, ≥37-weeks with singleton pregnancies at full dilatation that underwent transperineal ultrasound before vacuum placement for foetal extraction. Working in a transperineal longitudinal plane we evaluated: progression-angle, progression-distance and head direction; in a transverse plane: midline-angle and head-perineum distance. The vacuum extractions were classified as easy-group (EG) (≤3 vacuum pulls), difficult/impossible-group (DG)(≥4 pulls). Occiput-posterior presentations were not assessed.
Results: Fifty-two (52) patients were studied (26 patients per study group). No differences were observed in obstetric, neonatal or intrapartum characteristics between the study groups, with the following exceptions: new-born (NB) weight (3147 g versus 3540 g) and the number of vacuum pulls (1.4 EG versus 4.3 DG; p < 0.0005). The progression angle was 133.1° (123°-143°) in EG and 109.2° (97.2°-121.2°) in DG (p < 0.0005); up direction of foetal head was 88% versus 34.5% (p < 0.0005); progression distance was 37 mm (26.6-47.4) versus 29.9 mm (8.8-51; p = 0.003); midline angle was 35° (15.4°-54.6°) versus 59.7° (34.5°-84.9°; p = 0.0005); head-perineum distance was 41.9 mm (35.2-48.6) versus 48.9 mm (40.5-57.3; p = 0.017). The area under the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve for the progression angle was 0.9 (95%CI, 0.82-0.99), and the midline angle was 0.8 (95%CI, 0.67-0.92).
Conclusion: If previous to the placement of the vacuum cup the progression angle is ≤120°, the foetal head direction is horizontal or down, and the midline angle is ≥35°, there is an 85% chance that the delivery will require more than 4 vacuum pulls.
Keywords: Intrapartum ultrasound; second stage of labor; translabial ultrasound; transperineal ultrasound; vacuum delivery.
Similar articles
-
Utility of intrapartum transperineal ultrasound to predict cases of failure in vacuum extraction attempt and need of cesarean section to complete delivery.J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016;29(8):1348-52. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2015.1048680. Epub 2015 Jun 3. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016. PMID: 26037726
-
Intrapartum translabial ultrasound with pushing used to predict the difficulty in vacuum-assisted delivery of fetuses in non-occiput posterior position.J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016 Oct;29(20):3400-5. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2015.1130816. Epub 2016 Jan 14. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016. PMID: 26653174
-
Prediction of spontaneous vaginal delivery in nulliparous women with a prolonged second stage of labor: the value of intrapartum ultrasound.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Dec;221(6):642.e1-642.e13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.09.045. Epub 2019 Oct 4. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019. PMID: 31589867
-
Intrapartum ultrasound measurement of angle of progression at the onset of the second stage of labor for prediction of spontaneous vaginal delivery in term singleton pregnancies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Feb;226(2):205-214.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.07.031. Epub 2021 Aug 9. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022. PMID: 34384775
-
Intrapartum ultrasound and the choice between assisted vaginal and cesarean delivery.Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2021 Nov;3(6S):100439. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2021.100439. Epub 2021 Jun 30. Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2021. PMID: 34216834 Review.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources