A metagenomic study of the microbial communities in four parallel biogas reactors
- PMID: 25328537
- PMCID: PMC4200192
- DOI: 10.1186/s13068-014-0146-2
A metagenomic study of the microbial communities in four parallel biogas reactors
Abstract
Background: Biogas is a renewable energy carrier which is used for heat and power production or, in the form of purified methane, as a vehicle fuel. The formation of methane from organic materials is carried out by a mixed microbial community under anaerobic conditions. However, details about the microbes involved and their function are limited. In this study we compare the metagenomes of four parallel biogas reactors digesting a protein-rich substrate, relate microbiology to biogas performance, and observe differences in these reactors' microbial communities compared to the original inoculum culture.
Results: The biogas process performance during the startup phase of four parallel continuous stirred tank reactors (designated R1, R2, R3, and R4) co-digesting fish waste and cow manure was studied. The microbial composition of the inoculum (day 0) and the four reactors at day 59 was studied and compared using 454 FLX Titanium pyrosequencing. In the inoculum and the reactor samples, the Bacteria Clostridium and Syntrophomonas were highly abundant, and the dominating methanogen was the hydrogenotrophic Methanoculleus. Syntrophic prokaryotes frequently found in biogas reactors with high concentrations of ammonium and volatile fatty acids were detected in all samples. The species Candidatus Cloacimonas acidaminovorans of the candidate phylum Cloacimonetes (WWE1) increased in all reactors and was the dominating bacterium at day 59. In particular, this bacterium showed a very high abundance in R1, which distinguished this reactor significantly from the other reactors in terms of microbial composition. Methane production and the reactor slurry characteristics were monitored in the digestion period. Generally all four reactors operated stably and showed rather similar characteristics. The average methane production in the reactors varied between 0.278 and 0.296 L gVS(-1), with the lowest production in R1.
Conclusions: This study showed that four parallel reactors co-digesting manure and fish waste silage operated stably during a startup phase. Several important Archaea and Bacteria degrading the protein-rich substrate were identified. In particular, microorganisms involved in syntrophic methane production seemed to be important. The detailed characterization of the microbial communities presented in this work may be useful for the operation of biogas plants degrading substrates with high concentrations of proteins.
Keywords: Anaerobic digestion; Biofuel; Biogas; Biorefinery; Metagenomic; Methane; Syntrophic oxidation; Taxonomic structure.
Figures










Similar articles
-
Effects of a gradually increased load of fish waste silage in co-digestion with cow manure on methane production.Waste Manag. 2014 Aug;34(8):1553-9. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2014.04.011. Epub 2014 May 10. Waste Manag. 2014. PMID: 24820663
-
Reactor performances and microbial communities of biogas reactors: effects of inoculum sources.Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2016 Jan;100(2):987-95. doi: 10.1007/s00253-015-7062-7. Epub 2015 Oct 17. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2016. PMID: 26476649
-
Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor--a review.Indian J Environ Health. 2001 Apr;43(2):1-82. Indian J Environ Health. 2001. PMID: 12397675 Review.
-
Microbial granules on reactors performance during organic butyrate digestion: clean production.Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2023 Dec;43(8):1236-1256. doi: 10.1080/07388551.2022.2103641. Epub 2022 Sep 21. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2023. PMID: 36130802 Review.
-
Microbial dynamics in anaerobic digestion reactors for treating organic urban residues during the start-up process.Lett Appl Microbiol. 2017 Jun;64(6):438-445. doi: 10.1111/lam.12734. Epub 2017 May 4. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2017. PMID: 28295427
Cited by
-
The microbiome of the Black Sea water column analyzed by shotgun and genome centric metagenomics.Environ Microbiome. 2021 Mar 16;16(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s40793-021-00374-1. Environ Microbiome. 2021. PMID: 33902743 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of Storage Period on the Changes of Odorous Compound Concentrations and Bacterial Ecology for Identifying the Cause of Odor Production from Pig Slurry.PLoS One. 2016 Sep 19;11(9):e0162714. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0162714. eCollection 2016. PLoS One. 2016. PMID: 27642752 Free PMC article.
-
Long-term investigation of microbial community composition and transcription patterns in a biogas plant undergoing ammonia crisis.Microb Biotechnol. 2019 Mar;12(2):305-323. doi: 10.1111/1751-7915.13313. Epub 2018 Oct 31. Microb Biotechnol. 2019. PMID: 30381904 Free PMC article.
-
Metagenomic analysis and functional characterization of the biogas microbiome using high throughput shotgun sequencing and a novel binning strategy.Biotechnol Biofuels. 2016 Feb 2;9:26. doi: 10.1186/s13068-016-0441-1. eCollection 2016. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2016. PMID: 26839589 Free PMC article.
-
The active microbial community more accurately reflects the anaerobic digestion process: 16S rRNA (gene) sequencing as a predictive tool.Microbiome. 2018 Apr 2;6(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s40168-018-0449-9. Microbiome. 2018. PMID: 29609653 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Statistics Norway. SSB. 2013.Avfallsregnskapet 2011.http://www.ssb.no/natur-og-miljo/statistikker/avfregno.
-
- Anderson I, Ulrich LE, Lupa B, Susanti D, Porat I, Hooper SD, Lykidis A, Sieprawska-Lupa M, Dharmarajan L, Goltsman E, Lapidus A, Saunders E, Han C, Land M, Lucas S, Mukhopadhyay B, Whitman WB, Woese C, Bristow J, Kyrpides N. Genomic characterization of methanomicrobiales reveals three classes of methanogens. PLoS One. 2009;4:6. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Zinder SH. Physiological ecology of methanogenesis. In: Ferry JG, editor. Methanogenesis. Ecology, Physiology, Biochemistry and Genetics. Volume 1. 1. New York: Chapman and Hall; 1993. pp. 128–206.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources