The spider does not always win the fight for attention: Disengagement from threat is modulated by goal set
- PMID: 25329044
- DOI: 10.1080/02699931.2014.969198
The spider does not always win the fight for attention: Disengagement from threat is modulated by goal set
Abstract
Stimulus-driven preferential attention to threat can be modulated by goal-driven attention. However, it remains unclear how this goal-driven modulation affects specific attentional components implied in threat interference. We hypothesise that goal-driven modulation most strongly impacts delayed disengagement from threat. A spatial cueing task was used that disentangles delayed disengagement from attentional capture by tightly manipulating the locus of attention at the time of target onset. Different top-down goals were induced by instructing participants to identify bird/fish targets (Experiment 1) or spider/cat targets (Experiment 2) among animal non-targets. Delayed disengagement from a non-target spider was observed only when the spider was part of the target set, not when it was task-irrelevant. This corroborates evidence that threat stimuli do not necessarily override goal-driven attentional control and that extended processing of threatening distractors is not obligatory.
Keywords: Attention; Fear; Goal-driven; Stimulus-driven; Threat.
Similar articles
-
Threat captures attention, but not automatically: Top-down goals modulate attentional orienting to threat distractors.Atten Percept Psychophys. 2016 Oct;78(7):2266-79. doi: 10.3758/s13414-016-1142-3. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2016. PMID: 27234013
-
When spiders appear suddenly: spider-phobic patients are distracted by task-irrelevant spiders.Behav Res Ther. 2008 Feb;46(2):174-87. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2007.10.010. Epub 2007 Nov 17. Behav Res Ther. 2008. PMID: 18154873
-
Selective visual working memory in fear of spiders: the role of automaticity and material-specificity.J Anxiety Disord. 2009 Dec;23(8):1053-63. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2009.07.007. Epub 2009 Jul 9. J Anxiety Disord. 2009. PMID: 19643570
-
Top-down and bottom-up factors in threat-related perception and attention in anxiety.Biol Psychol. 2016 Dec;121(Pt B):160-172. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2016.08.006. Epub 2016 Aug 18. Biol Psychol. 2016. PMID: 27546616 Review.
-
Making something out of nothing: neutral content modulates attention in generalized anxiety disorder.Depress Anxiety. 2011 May;28(5):427-34. doi: 10.1002/da.20806. Epub 2011 Mar 29. Depress Anxiety. 2011. PMID: 21449004 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Irrelevant task suppresses the N170 of automatic attention allocation to fearful faces.Sci Rep. 2021 Jun 3;11(1):11754. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-91237-9. Sci Rep. 2021. PMID: 34083660 Free PMC article.
-
Electrophysiological correlates of attentional bias towards threat in children with high levels of social anxiety.Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2023 Feb;23(1):190-202. doi: 10.3758/s13415-022-01042-8. Epub 2022 Nov 15. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2023. PMID: 36380263
-
The priority of goal-relevant information and evolutionarily threatening information in early attention processing:Evidence from behavioral and ERP study.Sci Rep. 2020 May 14;10(1):8008. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-65062-5. Sci Rep. 2020. PMID: 32409674 Free PMC article.
-
Social processing modulates the initial allocation of attention towards angry faces: evidence from the N2pc component.Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2023 Nov 30;18(1):nsad070. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsad070. Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2023. PMID: 37971294 Free PMC article.
-
Attentional Bias to Beauty with Evolutionary Benefits: Evidence from Aesthetic Appraisal of Landscape Architecture.Front Psychol. 2018 Feb 7;9:71. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00071. eCollection 2018. Front Psychol. 2018. PMID: 29467696 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous