The Oregon experiment re-examined: the need to bolster primary care
- PMID: 25331018
- PMCID: PMC4707713
- DOI: 10.1136/bmj.g5976
The Oregon experiment re-examined: the need to bolster primary care
Abstract
John Heintzman and colleagues use less publicized evidence from Oregon to argue that unless access to primary care is improved, the benefits of widening the eligibility for public health insurance on individual and population health will be limited
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: We have read and understood BMJ policy on declaration of interests and declare that the authors are supported by grants for the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute.
Figures
References
-
- Congress of the United States of America. Social Security Act Amendments (1965). www.ourdocuments.gov/doc.php?flash=true&doc=99.
-
- Medicaid. Medicaid eligibility. www.medicaid.gov/Medicaid-chip-program-information/by-topics/eligibility....
-
- Fairbrother G, Jain A, Park HL, Massoudi MS, Haidery A, Gray BH. Churning in Medicaid managed care and its effect on accountability. J Health Care Poor Underserved 2004;15:30-41. - PubMed
-
- Short PF, Graefe DR, Schoen C. Churn, churn, churn: how instability of health insurance shapes America’s uninsured problem. Commonwealth Fund Issue Brief. 2003. www.commonwealthfund.org/~/media/files/publications/issue-brief/2003/nov.... - PubMed
-
- Decker SL. Two-thirds of primary care physicians accepted new Medicaid patients in 2011-12: a baseline to measure future acceptance rates. Health Aff (Millwood) 2013;32:1183-7. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical