Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 Jan;17(1):93-101.
doi: 10.1208/s12248-014-9682-8. Epub 2014 Oct 18.

Emerging technologies to increase ligand binding assay sensitivity

Affiliations
Review

Emerging technologies to increase ligand binding assay sensitivity

Saloumeh K Fischer et al. AAPS J. 2015 Jan.

Abstract

Ligand binding assays (LBAs) have been the method of choice for protein analyte measurements for more than four decades. Over the years, LBA methods have improved in sensitivity and achieved larger dynamic ranges by using alternative detection systems and new technologies. As a consequence, the landscape and application of immunoassay platforms has changed dramatically. The introduction of bead-based methods, coupled with single molecule detection standardization and the ability to amplify assay signals, has improved the sensitivity of many immunoassays, in some cases by several logs of magnitude. Three promising immunoassay platforms are described in this article: Single Molecule Counting (SMC™) from Singulex Inc, Single Molecule Arrays (Simoa™) from Quanterix Corporation, and Immuno-PCR (Imperacer®) from Chimera Biotec GmbH. These platforms have the potential to significantly improve immunoassay sensitivity and thereby address the bioanalytical needs and challenges faced during biopharmaceutical drug development.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Singulex: Single Molecule Counting (SMC™) technology
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Quanterix: Single Molecule Arrays (Simoa™) technology
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Chimera: Imperacer® ImmunoPCR (IPCR) technology

References

    1. Engvall E, Perlmann P. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Quantitative assay of immunoglobulin G. Immunochemistry. 1971;8(9):871–4. doi: 10.1016/0019-2791(71)90454-X. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lequin RM. Enzyme immunoassay (EIA)/enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) Clin Chem. 2005;51(12):2415–8. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2005.051532. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Novo P, Prazeres DM, Chu V, Conde JP. Microspot-based ELISA in microfluidics: chemiluminescence and colorimetry detection using integrated thin-film hydrogenated amorphous silicon photodiodes. Lab Chip. 2011;11(23):4063–71. doi: 10.1039/c1lc20362b. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kuo HT, Yeh JZ, Wu PH, Jiang CM, Wu MC. Application of immunomagnetic particles to enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for improvement of detection sensitivity of HCG. J Immunoass Immunochem. 2012;33(4):377–87. doi: 10.1080/15321819.2012.655820. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Li H, McGuire TC, Muller-Doblies UU, Crawford TB. A simpler, more sensitive competitive inhibition enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for detection of antibody to malignant catarrhal fever viruses. J Vet Diagn Investig Off Publ Am Assoc Vet Lab Diagnosticians Inc. 2001;13(4):361–4. doi: 10.1177/104063870101300417. - DOI - PubMed