Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Dec;34(6):1227-32.
doi: 10.1007/s10792-014-0010-1. Epub 2014 Oct 21.

Surgical results of idiopathic and secondary epiretinal membrane

Affiliations

Surgical results of idiopathic and secondary epiretinal membrane

Kyung Tae Kang et al. Int Ophthalmol. 2014 Dec.

Abstract

The aim of the study is to compare the surgical results of patients with an idiopathic and secondary epiretinal membrane (ERM) after pars plana vitrectomy and membranectomy. The medical records of 51 consecutive patients with ERM who underwent pars plana vitrectomy and membranectomy with a follow-up >1 year were reviewed retrospectively. Age, sex, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA, logMAR), lens status, presence of additional removal of internal limiting membrane (ILM), and recurrence rate within 1 year after the operation were compared in the idiopathic and secondary ERM groups. Forty-one eyes had idiopathic ERM and 10 eyes had secondary ERM. Preoperative average BCVA values in the two groups were 0.47 and 0.70, respectively, and the postoperative average BCVA values were 0.28 and 0.18, respectively, with significant improvement postoperatively in both groups (p < 0.01, p < 0.01). The recurrence rate within 1 year after surgery in the idiopathic group was 4.88 % and that in the secondary group was 20 % (p = 0.03). The recurrence rate was 4.3 % in the idiopathic group with ILM removal and it was 5.9 % without ILM removal (p = 0.03). No case recurred within 1 year in the secondary group with ILM removal but the recurrence rate was 33.3 % in the group without ILM removal (p = 0.01). Although patients with secondary ERM gained better visual acuity improvement postoperatively, the recurrence rate was higher within 1 year than that of patients with idiopathic ERM. Removal of the ILM may lower recurrence rates.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Retina. 2011 Apr;31(4):779-84 - PubMed
    1. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1998 Oct;236(10):739-46 - PubMed
    1. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2005 Aug;33(4):379-85 - PubMed
    1. Br J Ophthalmol. 1988 Sep;72(9):692-5 - PubMed
    1. Arch Ophthalmol. 1988 Jun;106(6):761-4 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources