Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2014 Oct 21;2014(10):CD004638.
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004638.pub3.

Minimally invasive surgical techniques versus open myomectomy for uterine fibroids

Priya Bhave Chittawar  1 , Sebastian Franik, Annefloor W Pouwer, Cindy Farquhar
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Minimally invasive surgical techniques versus open myomectomy for uterine fibroids

Priya Bhave Chittawar et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. .

Abstract

Background: Fibroids are common benign tumours arising in the uterus. Myomectomy is the surgical treatment of choice for women with symptomatic fibroids who prefer or want uterine conservation. Myomectomy can be performed by conventional laparotomy, by mini-laparotomy or by minimal access techniques such as hysteroscopy and laparoscopy.

Objectives: To determine the benefits and harms of laparoscopic or hysteroscopic myomectomy compared with open myomectomy.

Search methods: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (inception to July 2014), the Menstrual Disorders and Subfertility Group (MDSG) Specialised Register of Controlled Trials (inception to July 2014), MEDLINE(R) (inception to July 2014), EMBASE (inception to July 2014), PsycINFO (inception to July 2014) and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) (inception to July 2014) to identify relevant randomised controlled trials (RCTs). We also searched trial registers and references from selected relevant trials and review articles. We applied no language restriction in these searches.

Selection criteria: All published and unpublished randomised controlled trials comparing myomectomy via laparotomy, mini-laparotomy or laparoscopically assisted mini-laparotomy versus laparoscopy or hysteroscopy in premenopausal women with uterine fibroids diagnosed by clinical and ultrasound examination were included in the meta-analysis.

Data collection and analysis: We conducted study selection and extracted data in duplicate. Primary outcomes were postoperative pain, reported in six studies, and in-hospital adverse events, reported in eight studies. Secondary outcomes included length of hospital stay, reported in four studies, operating time, reported in eight studies and recurrence of fibroids, reported in three studies. Each of the other secondary outcomes-improvement in menstrual symptoms, change in quality of life, repeat myomectomy and hysterectomy at a later date-was reported in a single study. Odds ratios (ORs), mean differences (MDs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated and data combined using the fixed-effect model. The quality of evidence was assessed using Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methods.

Main results: We found 23 potentially relevant trials, of which nine were eligible for inclusion in this review. The nine trials included in our meta-analysis had a total of 808 women. The overall risk of bias of included studies was low, as most studies properly reported their methods.Postoperative pain: Postoperative pain was measured on a visual analogue scale (VAS), with zero meaning 'no pain at all' and 10 signifying 'pain as bad as it could be.' Postoperative pain was significantly less, as determined by subjectively assessed pain score at six hours (MD -2.40, 95% CI -2.88 to -1.92, one study, 148 women, moderate-quality evidence) and 48 hours postoperatively (MD -1.90, 95% CI -2.80 to -1.00, two studies, 80 women, I² = 0%, moderate-quality evidence) in the laparoscopic myomectomy group compared with the open myomectomy group. This means that among women undergoing laparoscopic myomectomy, mean pain score at six hours and 48 hours would be likely to range from about three points lower to one point lower on a VAS zero-to-10 scale. No significant difference in postoperative pain score was noted between the laparoscopic and open myomectomy groups at 24 hours (MD -0.29, 95% CI -0.7 to 0.12, four studies, 232 women, I² = 43%, moderate-quality evidence). The overall quality of these findings is moderate; therefore further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate.In-hospital adverse events: No evidence suggested a difference in unscheduled return to theatre (OR 3.04, 95% CI 0.12 to 75.86, two studies, 188 women, I² = 0%, low-quality evidence) and laparoconversion (OR 1.11, 95% CI 0.44 to 2.83, eight studies, 756 women, I² = 53%, moderate-quality evidence) when open myomectomy was compared with laparoscopic myomectomy. Only one study including 148 women reported injury to pelvic organs (no events were described in other studies), and no significant difference was noted between laparoscopic myomectomy and laparoscopically assisted mini-laparotomy myomectomy (OR 3.04, 95% CI 0.12 to 75.86). Significantly lower risk of postoperative fever was observed in the laparoscopic myomectomy group compared with groups treated with all types of open myomectomy (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.26 to 0.77, I² = 0%, six studies, 635 women). This indicates that among women undergoing laparoscopic myomectomy, the risk of postoperative fever is 50% lower than among those treated with open surgery. No studies reported immediate hysterectomy, uterine rupture, thromboembolism or mortality. Six studies including 549 women reported haemoglobin drop, but these studies were not pooled because of extreme heterogeneity (I² = 97%) and therefore could not be included in the analysis.

Authors' conclusions: Laparoscopic myomectomy is a procedure associated with less subjectively reported postoperative pain, lower postoperative fever and shorter hospital stay compared with all types of open myomectomy. No evidence suggested a difference in recurrence risk between laparoscopic and open myomectomy. More studies are needed to assess rates of uterine rupture, occurrence of thromboembolism, need for repeat myomectomy and hysterectomy at a later stage.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No declarations of interest were made.

Figures

1
1
Study flow diagram.
2
2
Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.
3
3
Risk of bias graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.
4
4
Forest plot of comparison: 1 Laparoscopic myomectomy versus open myomectomy (all types), outcome: 1.2 Postoperative pain at 24 hours.
5
5
Forest plot of comparison: 1 Laparoscopic myomectomy versus open myomectomy (all types), outcome: 1.3 Postoperative pain at 48 hours.
6
6
Forest plot of comparison: 1 Laparoscopic myomectomy versus open myomectomy (all types), outcome: 1.5 Perioperative in‐hospital adverse events; laparoconversion.
7
7
Forest plot of comparison: 1 Laparoscopic myomectomy versus open myomectomy (all types), outcome: 1.7 In‐hospital adverse events; postoperative fever.
1.1
1.1. Analysis
Comparison 1 Laparoscopic myomectomy versus open myomectomy (all types), Outcome 1 Postoperative pain at 6 hours.
1.2
1.2. Analysis
Comparison 1 Laparoscopic myomectomy versus open myomectomy (all types), Outcome 2 Postoperative pain at 24 hours.
1.3
1.3. Analysis
Comparison 1 Laparoscopic myomectomy versus open myomectomy (all types), Outcome 3 Postoperative pain at 48 hours.
1.4
1.4. Analysis
Comparison 1 Laparoscopic myomectomy versus open myomectomy (all types), Outcome 4 Perioperative in‐hospital adverse events; unscheduled return to theatre.
1.5
1.5. Analysis
Comparison 1 Laparoscopic myomectomy versus open myomectomy (all types), Outcome 5 Perioperative in‐hospital adverse events; laparoconversion.
1.6
1.6. Analysis
Comparison 1 Laparoscopic myomectomy versus open myomectomy (all types), Outcome 6 Perioperative in‐hospital adverse events; injury to pelvic organs.
1.7
1.7. Analysis
Comparison 1 Laparoscopic myomectomy versus open myomectomy (all types), Outcome 7 In‐hospital adverse events; postoperative fever.
1.8
1.8. Analysis
Comparison 1 Laparoscopic myomectomy versus open myomectomy (all types), Outcome 8 Haemoglobin drop (g/dL).
1.9
1.9. Analysis
Comparison 1 Laparoscopic myomectomy versus open myomectomy (all types), Outcome 9 Length of hospital stay (hours).
1.10
1.10. Analysis
Comparison 1 Laparoscopic myomectomy versus open myomectomy (all types), Outcome 10 Operating time (minutes).
1.11
1.11. Analysis
Comparison 1 Laparoscopic myomectomy versus open myomectomy (all types), Outcome 11 Improvement in menstrual symptoms such as heaviness of periods, or pressure symptoms.
1.12
1.12. Analysis
Comparison 1 Laparoscopic myomectomy versus open myomectomy (all types), Outcome 12 Recurrence of fibroids.
1.13
1.13. Analysis
Comparison 1 Laparoscopic myomectomy versus open myomectomy (all types), Outcome 13 Repeat myomectomy.
1.14
1.14. Analysis
Comparison 1 Laparoscopic myomectomy versus open myomectomy (all types), Outcome 14 Hysterectomy at a later time.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Update of

References

References to studies included in this review

Alessandri 2006 {published data only}
    1. Alessandri F, Lijoi D, Mistrangelo E, Ferrero S, Ragni N. Randomized study of laparoscopic versus minilaparotomic myomectomy for uterine myomas. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology 2006;13(2):92‐7. [CENTRAL: CN‐00563190; DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2005.11.008] - DOI - PubMed
Cicinelli 2009 {published data only}
    1. Cicinelli E, Tinelli R, Colafiglio G, Saliani N. Laparoscopy vs minilaparotomy in women with symptomatic uterine myomas: a prospective randomized study. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology 2009;16(4):422‐6. [CENTRAL: CN‐00721670 ; DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2009.03.011] - DOI - PubMed
Holzer 2006 {published data only}
    1. Holzer A, Jirecek ST, Illievich UM, Huber J, Wenzl RJ. Laparoscopic versus open myomectomy: a double‐blind study to evaluate postoperative pain. Anesthesia and Analgesia 2006;102(5):1480‐4. [CENTRAL: CN‐00564509 ] - PubMed
Mais 1995 {published data only}
    1. Mais V, Ajossa S, Guerriero S, Mascia M, Solla E, Melis GB. Laparoscopic versus abdominal myomectomy: a prospective, randomized trial to evaluate benefits in early outcome.. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 1996;174(2):654‐8. [CENTRAL: CN‐00123957] - PubMed
Palomba 2007 {published data only}
    1. Palomba S, Marconi D, Falbo A, Russo T, Mattei A, Zupi E, et al. A randomized controlled trial comparing the laparoscopic and minilaparotomic approach for uterine leiomyomas: surgical and fertility outcomes. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology 2006;13(Suppl 5):S15‐16.
    1. Palomba S, Zupi E, Falbo A, Russo T, Marconi D, Tolino A, et al. A multicenter randomized, controlled study comparing laparoscopic versus minilaparotomic myomectomy: reproductive outcomes.. Fertility and Sterility 2007;88(4):933‐41. [CENTRAL: 00609541] - PubMed
    1. Palomba S, Zupi E, Russo T, Falbo A, Marconi D, Tolino A, et al. A multicenter randomized, controlled study comparing laparoscopic versus minilaparotomic myomectomy: short‐term outcomes. Fertility and Sterility 2007;88(4):942‐51. [CENTRAL: CN‐00609333] - PubMed
Rossetti 2001 {published data only}
    1. Rossetti A, Sizzi O, Soranna L, Cucinelli F, Mancuso S, Lanzone A. Long‐term results of laparoscopic myomectomy: recurrence rate in comparison with abdominal myomectomy. Human Reproduction 2001;16(4):770‐4. - PubMed
Seracchioli 2000 {published data only}
    1. Seracchioli R, Rossi S, Govoni F, Rossi E, Venturoli S. Efficacy of laparoscopic myomectomy in cases of large myoma(s): randomized comparison with laparotomic myomectomy. Human Reproduction 1999;14:274. - PubMed
    1. Seracchioli R, Rossi S, Govoni F, Rossi E, Venturoli S, Bulletti C, et al. Fertility and obstetric outcome after laparoscopic myomectomy of large myomata: a randomized comparison with abdominal myomectomy. Human Reproduction 2000;15(12):2663‐8. [CENTRAL: CN‐00330415] - PubMed
Sesti 2008 {published data only}
    1. Sesti F, Capobianco F, Capozzolo T, Pietropolli A, Piccione E. Isobaric gasless laparoscopy versus minilaparotomy in uterine myomectomy: a randomized trial. Surgical Endoscopy 2008;22(4):917‐23. [CENTRAL: CN‐00636939] - PubMed
Tan 2008 {published data only}
    1. Tan J, Sun Y, Dai H, Zhong B, Wang D. A randomized trial of laparoscopic versus laparoscopic‐assisted minilaparotomy myomectomy for removal of large uterine myoma: short‐term outcomes. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology 2008;15(4):402‐9. [CENTRAL: CN‐00649521 ] - PubMed

References to studies excluded from this review

Angioni 2005 {published data only}
    1. Angioni 2005. Laparoscopic vs abdominal myomectomy: role on fertility and pregnancy outcome. Gynecological Surgery 2005;2(Suppl 1):S13.
Benassi 2005 {published data only}
    1. Benassi L, Marconi L, Benassi G, Accorsi F, Angeloni M, Besagni F. Minilaparotomy vs laparotomyfor uterine myomectomies: a randomized controlled trial. Minerva Gynecology 2005;57:169‐73. - PubMed
Birsan 2003 {published data only}
    1. Birsan A, Brunao D, Detchev R, Ponclet C, Darai E. Vaginal and laparoscopic myomectomy for large posterior myomas: results of a pilot study. European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 2003;110:89‐93. - PubMed
Cagnacci 2003 {published data only}
    1. Cagnacci A, Pirillo D, Malmusi S, Arangino S, Alessandrini C, Volpe A. Early outcome of myomectomy by laparotomy, minilaparotomy and laparoscopically assisted minilaparotomy. A randomized prospective study. Human Reproduction 2003;18(12):2590‐4. - PubMed
Campo 2003 {published data only}
    1. Campo S, Campo V, Gambadauro P. Reproductive outcome before and after laparoscopic or abdominal myomectomy for subserous or intramural myomas. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 2003;110(2):215‐9. - PubMed
Falcone 2002 {published data only}
    1. Falcone T, Bedaiwy MA. Minimally invasive management of uterine fibroids. Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynaecology 2002;14(4):401‐7. - PubMed
Fanfani 2005 {published data only}
    1. Fanfani F, Fagotti A, Bifulco G, Ercoli A, Malzoni M, Scambia G. A prospective study of laparoscopy versus minilaparotomy in the treatment of uterine myomas. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology 2005;12(6):470‐4. [CENTRAL: CN‐00600174] - PubMed
Holub 2006 {published data only}
    1. Holub Z. Surgical results of myomectomy using laparoscopic and minilaparotomic access. Women's Health 2007;3(5):537‐9. - PubMed
Kalogiannidis I. {published data only}
    1. Kalogiannidis I, Prapas N, Xiromeritis P, Prapas Y. Laparoscopically assisted myomectomy versus abdominal myomectomy in short‐term outcomes: a prospective study. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 2010;281(5):865‐70. - PubMed
Malzoni 2010 {published data only}
    1. Malzoni M, Tinelli R, Cosentino F, Iuzzolino D, Surico D, Reich H. Laparoscopy versus minilaparotomy in women with symptomatic uterine myomas: short‐term and fertility results. Fertility Sterility 2010;93(7):2368‐73. - PubMed
Palomba 2005 {published data only}
    1. Palomba S, Zupi E. Minilaparotomic and laparoscopic myomectomy: a comparative study. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology 2005;12:S122‐S124.
Signorile 2000 {published data only}
    1. Signorile P, Gargiulo F, Latavo C. Laparoscopic and ultraminilaparotomic (3cm) myomectomy (LUM): preliminary report of a new surgical technique. XVI FIGO World Congress of O & G. 2000; Vol. Abstract book 5:25‐6.
Wang 2011 {published data only}
    1. Wang J, Yang F, Gao T, Li L, Xia H, Li H. Gasless laparoscopy versus conventional laparoscopy in uterine myomectomy: a single centre randomized trial. The Journal of International Medical Research 2011;39:172‐8. - PubMed
Zhang 2005 {published data only}
    1. Zhang GL, Wen WQ, Xing FQ. Effect of enucleation of hysteromyoma by laparoscopic surgery on protein oxidation and lipid hyperoxidation. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi 2005;85(3):177‐80. - PubMed

Additional references

Baird 2003
    1. Day Baird D, Dunson DB, Hill MC, Cousins D, Schectman JM. High cumulative incidence of uterine leiomyoma in black and white women: ultrasound evidence. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2003;188(1):100‐7. - PubMed
Bajekal 2000
    1. Bajekal N, Li TC. Fibroids, infertility and pregnancy wastage. Human Reproduction Update 2000;6(6):614‐20. - PubMed
Bonney 1931
    1. Bonney V. The technique and results of myomectomy. Lancet 1931;220:171‐7.
Buttram 1981
    1. Buttram VC, Reiter RC. Uterine leiomyomata. Fertility and Sterility 1981;36:433‐45. - PubMed
Cramer 1990
    1. Cramer SF, Patel A. The frequency of uterine leiomyomas. American Journal of Clinical Pathology 1990;94(4):435‐8. - PubMed
Downes 2010
    1. Downes E, Sikirica V, Gilabert‐Estelles J, Bolge SC, Dodd SL, Maroulis C, et al. The burden of uterine fibroids in five European countries. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology 2010;152(1):96‐102. - PubMed
Drinville 2007
    1. Drinville SJ, Memarzadeh S. Benign disorders of the uterine corpus. Current Diagnosis & Treatment Obstetrics & Gynecology 2007;10:639‐53.
Dubuisson 2000
    1. Dubuisson JB, Fauconnier A, Babaki‐Fard K, Chapron C. Laparoscopic myomectomy: a current view. Human Reproduction Update 2000;6(6):588‐94. - PubMed
FDA 2014
    1. Food, Drug Administration. Quantitative Assessment of the Prevalence of Unsuspected Uterine Sarcoma in Women Undergoing Treatment of Uterine Fibroids. Summary and Key Findings. FDA Safety Communications April 17, 2014.
Frishman 2005
    1. Frishman GN, Jurema MW. Myomas and myomectomy. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology 2005;12(5):443‐56. - PubMed
Gentry 2000
    1. Gentry C, Okolo S, Fong L, Crow J, Maclean A, Perret C. Quantification of vascular endothelial growth factor‐A in leiomyomas and adjacent myometrium. Clinical Science 2001;101:691‐5. - PubMed
Golan 1996
    1. Golan A. GnRH analogues in the treatment of uterine fibroids. Human Reproduction 1996;11(Suppl 3):33‐41. - PubMed
Higgins 2011
    1. Higgins JPT, Green S, editors. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. www.cochrane‐handbook.org. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011.
Jin 2009
    1. Jin C, Hu Y, Chen XC, Zheng FY, Lin F, Zhou K, et al. Laparoscopic versus open myomectomy—a meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology 2009;145(1):14‐21. - PubMed
LaMorte 1993
    1. LaMorte A, Lalwani S, Diamond M. Morbidity associated with abdominal myomectomy. Obstetrics and Gynecology 1993;82(6):897‐900. - PubMed
Lethaby 2001
    1. Lethaby A, Vollenhoven B, Sowter MC. Pre‐operative GnRH analogue therapy before hysterectomy or myomectomy foruterine fibroids. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2001, (2). [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000547] - DOI - PubMed
Lethaby 2002
    1. Lethaby A, Vollenhoven B. Fibroids. Clinical Evidence 2002;14:1666‐78. - PubMed
Levy 2008
    1. Levy BS. Modern management of uterine fibroids. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica 2008;87(8):812‐23. - PubMed
Makinen 2011
    1. Makinen N, Mehine M, Tolvanen J, Kaasinen E, Li Y, Lehtonen HJ, et al. MED12, the mediator complex subunit 12 gene, is mutated at high frequency in uterine leiomyomas. Science 2011;334(6053):252‐5. - PubMed
Merill 2008
    1. Merill RM, Layman AB, Oderda D, Asche C. Risk estimates of hysterectomy and selected conditions commonly treated with hysterectomy. Annals of Epidemiology 2008;18(3):253‐60. - PubMed
Metwally 2012
    1. Metwally M, Cheong YC, Horne AW. Surgical treatment of fibroids for subfertility. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2012, Issue Issue 11. [Art. No.: CD003857] - PubMed
Miller 2000
    1. Miller CE. Myomectomy. Comparison of open and laparoscopic techniques. Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America 2000;27(2):407‐20. - PubMed
Mine 2001
    1. Mine N, Kurose K, Nagai H, Doi D, Ota Y, Yoneyama K, et al. Gene fusion involving HMGIC is a frequent aberration in uterine leiomyomas. Journal of Human Genetics 2001;46:408‐12. - PubMed
Nieboer 2009
    1. Nieboer TE, Johnson N, Lethaby A, Tavender E, Curr E, Garry R, et al. Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynecological disease. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2009;3. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD003677.pub4] - DOI
Okolo 2008
    1. Okolo S. Incidence, aetiology and epidemiology of uterine fibroids. Best Practice & Research. Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology 2008;22(4):571‐88. - PubMed
Pritts 2009
    1. Pritts EA, Parker WH, Olive DL. Fibroids and infertility: an updated systematic review of the evidence. Fertility and Sterility 2009;91(4):1215‐23. - PubMed
Querleu 1993
    1. Querleu D, Chevallier L, Chapron C, Bruhat M. Complications of gynaecological surgery. A French multicenter collaborative study. Gynaecological Endoscopy 1993;2:3‐6. - PubMed
Ravina 1995
    1. Ravina JH, Herbreteau D, Ciraru‐Vigneron N, Bouret J, Houdart E, Aymard A, et al. Arterial embolisation to treat uterine myomata. Lancet 1995;346:671‐2. - PubMed
Semm 1979
    1. Semm K. New methods of pelviscopy (gynaecologic laparoscopy) for myomectomy, ovariectomy, tubectomy and adnectomy. Endoscopy 1979;11:85‐93. - PubMed
Senturk 2001
    1. Senturk LM, Sozen I, Gutierrez L, Atrici A. Interleukin 8 production and interleukin 8 receptor expression in human myometrium and leiomyoma. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 2001;184:559‐66. - PubMed
Stewart 2001
    1. Stewart EA. Uterine fibroids. Lancet 2001;357:293‐8. - PubMed
Viswanathan 2007
    1. Viswanathan M, Hartmann K, McKoy N, Stuart G, Rankins N, Thieda P, et al. Management of Uterine Fibroids: An Update of the Evidence. AHRQ Publication No. 07‐E011. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment No. 154 Prepared by RTI International–University of North Carolina Evidence‐based Practice Center under Contract No. 290‐02‐0016. Rockville, MD, USA: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, July 2007.
Wallach 2004
    1. Wallach EE, Vlahos NF. Uterine myomas: an overview of development, clinical features, and management. Obstetrics and Gynecology 2004;104(2):393‐406. - PubMed

Publication types