Preliminary results of a phase II trial of proton radiotherapy for pediatric rhabdomyosarcoma
- PMID: 25332253
- PMCID: PMC4226806
- DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2014.56.1548
Preliminary results of a phase II trial of proton radiotherapy for pediatric rhabdomyosarcoma
Erratum in
- J Clin Oncol. 2015 Jan 10;33(2):228
Abstract
Purpose: This prospective phase II study was designed to assess disease control and to describe acute and late adverse effects of treatment with proton radiotherapy in children with rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS).
Patients and methods: Fifty-seven patients with localized RMS (age 21 years or younger) or metastatic embryonal RMS (age 2 to 10 years) were enrolled between February 2005 and August 2012. All patients were treated with chemotherapy based on either vincristine, actinomycin, and cyclophosphamide or vincristine, actinomycin, and ifosfamide-based chemotherapy and proton radiation. Surgical resection was based on tumor site and accessibility. Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, Version 3.0, was used to assess and grade adverse effects of treatment. Concurrent enrollment onto Children's Oncology Group or European Pediatric Sarcoma Study Group protocols was allowed. All pathology and imaging were reviewed at the treating institution.
Results: Median follow-up was 47 months (range, 14 to 102 months) for survivors. Five-year event-free survival (EFS), overall survival (OS), and local control (LC) were 69%, 78%, and 81%, respectively, for the entire cohort. The 5-year LC by risk group was 93% for low-risk and 77% for intermediate-risk disease. There were 13 patients with grade 3 acute toxicity and three patients with grade 3 late toxicity. There were no acute or late toxicities higher than grade 3.
Conclusion: Five-year LC, EFS, and OS rates were similar to those observed in comparable trials that used photon radiation. Acute and late toxicity rates were favorable. Proton radiation appears to represent a safe and effective radiation modality for pediatric RMS.
© 2014 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.
Conflict of interest statement
Authors' disclosures of potential conflicts of interest and author contributions are found at the end of this article.
Figures
Comment in
-
[Proton therapy of pediatric rhabdomyosarcoma: Same tumor control as photon therapy, with less adverse effects].Strahlenther Onkol. 2015 Oct;191(10):814-6. doi: 10.1007/s00066-015-0878-3. Strahlenther Onkol. 2015. PMID: 26385859 German. No abstract available.
References
-
- Ries LAG, Smith MA, Gurney JG, et al. United States SEER program 1975-1995, National Cancer Institute, SEER Program. NIH Pub. No. 99-4649. Bethesda: MD; 1999. Cancer Incidence and Survival Among Children and Adolescents.
-
- Arndt CA, Stoner JA, Hawkins DS, et al. Vincristine, actinomycin, and cyclophosphamide compared with vincristine, actinomycin, and cyclophosphamide alternating with vincristine, topotecan, and cyclophosphamide for intermediate-risk rhabdomyosarcoma: Children's Oncology Group study D9803. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:5182–5188. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Raney RB, Walterhouse DO, Meza JL, et al. Results of the Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study Group D9602 protocol, using vincristine and dactinomycin with or without cyclophosphamide and radiation therapy, for newly diagnosed patients with low-risk embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma: A report from the Soft Tissue Sarcoma Committee of the Children's Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:1312–1318. - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
