Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014;17(Pt 1):186-93.
doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-10404-1_24.

Robust anatomical landmark detection for MR brain image registration

Robust anatomical landmark detection for MR brain image registration

Dong Han et al. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv. 2014.

Abstract

Correspondence matching between MR brain images is often challenging due to large inter-subject structural variability. In this paper, we propose a novel landmark detection method for robust establishment of correspondences between subjects. Specifically, we first annotate distinctive landmarks in the training images. Then, we use regression forest to simultaneously learn (1) the optimal set of features to best characterize each landmark and (2) the non-linear mappings from local patch appearances of image points to their displacements towards each landmark. The learned regression forests are used as landmark detectors to predict the locations of these landmarks in new images. Since landmark detection is performed in the entire image domain, our method can cope with large anatomical variations among subjects. We evaluated our method by applying it to MR brain image registration. Experimental results indicate that by combining our method with existing registration method, obvious improvement in registration accuracy can be achieved.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The six manually annotated landmarks on the corners/edges of the ventricular region in one training image. The white cross marks denote the landmark locations.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Registration results on 5 testing images that are substantially different in appearance from the fixed image. Row 1: The fixed image and the original moving images. Row 2: Registration results given by HAMMER alone. Row 3: Registration results given by landmark-based initialization. Row 4: Registration results given by further refinement using HAMMER.

References

    1. Prastawa M, Gilmore JH, Lin W, Gerig G. Automatic Segmentation of MR Images of the Developing Newborn Brain. Med. Image Anal. 2005;9:457–466. - PubMed
    1. Shen D. Fast Image Registration by Hierarchical Soft Correspondence Detection. Pattern Recogn. 2009;42:954–961. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wu G, Kim M, Wang Q, Shen D. S-HAMMER: Hierarchical Attribute-Guided, Symmetric Diffeomorphic Registration for MR Brain Images. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2014;35:1044–1060. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Criminisi A, Robertson D, Konukoglu E, Shotton J, Pathak S, White S, Siddiqui K. Regression Forests for Efficient Anatomy Detection and Localization in Computed Tomography Scans. Med. Image Anal. 2013;17:1293–1303. - PubMed
    1. Shen D, Davatzikos C. HAMMER: Hierarchical Attribute Matching Mechanism for Elastic Registration. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging. 2002;21:1421–1439. - PubMed

MeSH terms