Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comment
. 2014 Oct 21:3:e04779.
doi: 10.7554/eLife.04779.

How to build your own island

Affiliations
Comment

How to build your own island

Colum Walsh et al. Elife. .

Abstract

Inserting artificially-generated 'DNA islands' into a genome has shed new light on why some DNA sequences are methylated and others are not.

Keywords: CpG islands; DNA methylation; bivalent chromatin; chromosomes; epigenetics; evolutionary biology; genes; genomics; high throughput genome editing; histone modifications; human; mouse.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests:The authors declare that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. An artificial CpG island reveals its secrets.
(A) Wachter et al. inserted stretches of DNA that were G + C rich, and also had a high frequency of CpG sites, into an area of the genome that is devoid of genes (‘gene-poor region’). Histones associated with the DNA were assayed for histone marks: the number 2 indicates histones associated with the artificial CpG island; 1 and 3 indicate histones not associated with the island. (B) The CpG sites in these artificial islands remained unmethylated and recruited both activating and inactivating histone marks (labelled H3K4me3 and H3K27me3 respectively). The rows of open or filled circles represent unmethylated or methylated CpG sites; and the graph represents the frequency of each histone mark in different regions, in and around the artificial island. (C) Removal of CpG sites from the artificial island prevented the accumulation of both types of histone mark. (D) Decreasing the G + C content caused CpG sites to be over-methylated, which blocked histone modification. However, this could be overcome, at least in part, by either preventing CpG site methylation to begin with, or (as revealed by Krebs et al.) by adding a strong binding site for a transcription factor into the island which could drive its demethylation (arrow).

Comment on

References

    1. Bird AP. 1980. DNA methylation and the frequency of CpG in animal DNA. Nucleic Acids Research 8:1499–1504. doi: 10.1093/nar/8.7.1499 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Krebs A, Dessus-Babus S, Burger L, Schübeler D. 2014. High-throughput engineering of a mammalian genome reveals building principles of methylation states at CG rich regions. eLife 3:e04094. doi: 10.7554/eLife.04094 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lee JH, Voo KS, Skalnik DG. 2001. Identification and characterization of the DNA binding domain of CpG-binding protein. Journal of Biological Chemistry 276:44669–44676. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M107179200 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Li E, Beard C, Jaenisch R. 1993. Role for DNA methylation in genomic imprinting. Nature 366:362–365. doi: 10.1038/366362a0 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lienert F, Wirbelauer C, Som I, Dean A, Mohn F, Schübeler D. 2011. Identification of genetic elements that autonomously determine DNA methylation states. Nature Genetics 43:1091–1097. doi: 10.1038/ng.946 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources