Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2014 Aug 15;7(9):5810-8.
eCollection 2014.

A fine decision tree consisted of CK5/6, IMP3 and TTF1 for cytological diagnosis among reactive mesothelial cells, metastatic adenocarcinoma of lung and non-lung origin in pleural effusion

Affiliations
Comparative Study

A fine decision tree consisted of CK5/6, IMP3 and TTF1 for cytological diagnosis among reactive mesothelial cells, metastatic adenocarcinoma of lung and non-lung origin in pleural effusion

Jinhai Yan et al. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. .

Abstract

The utility of combination with CK5/6, IMP3 and TTF1 to differentiate among reactive mesothelial cells (RMs), metastatic adenocarcinoma of lung (LAC) and non-lung (NLAC) origin was investigated by using immunocytochemistry (ICC) and conventional PCR (C-PCR) in pleural effusion. A total of 108 cell blocks (32 RMs, 51 LAC and 25 NLAC were evaluated by ICC for CK5/6, IMP3 and TTF1 protein expression. In addition, we further performed C-PCR for amplification of CK5/6, IMP3 and TTF1 DNA from 28 specimens (9 MAC and 7 RMs, 6 LAC and 6 NLAC) for molecular diagnosis. CK5/6 staining was observed in the majority of reactive specimens (78.1%) and was rare in adenocarcinoma cells (14.5%), whereas the opposite was true for IMP3 and TTF1. We found a high frequency of TTF1 positivity (76.5%) in LAC, but not in NLAC (4.0%); while there was no significant difference of IMP3 expression in LAC (88.2%) and NLAC (88.0%). The 487 bp DNA fragments of IMP3 was expected to be amplified in 6/9 of adenocarcinoma cases showed negative in ICC; and the 394 bp DNA fragments of CK5/6 was also expected to be amplified in 4/7 of RMs cases showed negative in ICC. Consistent with ICC results, there was significant difference of TTF1 expression in the LAC and NLAC compared with IMP3 expression. The combination with CK5/6, IMP3 and TTF1 immunostaining appears to be useful to improve the accuracy of cytological diagnoses between RMs, metastatic adenocarcinoma of lung and non-lung origin in pleural effusion. In addition, C-PCR may act as a useful supplemental approach for ICC, especially negative cases in ICC for differential cytological diagnosis.

Keywords: CK5/6; IMP3; PCR; TTF1; adenocarcinoma; pleural effusion.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Reactive mesothelial cells (RMs) are shown in Pleural Effusion using by (A) HE, (B) CK5/6 ICC stain, (C) IMP3 ICC stain; Metastatic adenocarcinoma (MAC) cells are shown in pleural effusion using by (D) HE, (E) CK5/6 ICC stain, (F) IMP3 ICC stain. HE, Hematoxylin & Eosin staining; ICC, Immunocytochemistry. (×400).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Metastatic lung adenocarcinoma (LAC) cells are shown in pleural effusion using by (A) HE, (B) IMP3 ICC stain, (C) TTF1 ICC stain; Metastatic adenocarcinoma of non-lung (NLAC) origin are shown in pleural effusion using by (D) HE, (E) IMP3 ICC stain, (F) TTF1 ICC stain. HE, Hematoxylin & Eosin staining; ICC, Immunocytochemistry. (×400).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Conventional PCR amplified products of CK5/6, IMP3, TTF1 DNA in paraffin-embedded cell blocks of patients with reactive mesothelial cells (RMs), metastatic adenocarcinoma of lung (LAC) and non-lung (NLAC) origin in 2% agarose gel. A. IMP3 expression in 6/9 of MAC showed negative in ICC; B. CK5/6 expression in 4/7 of RMs showed negative in ICC; C. IMP3 expression in 6/6 of LAC and 6/6 of NLAC; D. TTF1 expression in 6/6 of LAC and 0/6 of NLAC. M, DNA Maker (DL1000); A1-A6, Paraffin-embedded MAC cell blocks; R1-R6, Paraffin-embedded RMs cell blocks; N, Negative control.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Decision tree for the cytologic diagnosis of reactive mesothelial cells (RMs), metastatic adenocarcinoma of lung (LAC) and non-lung (NLAC) origin by using CK5/6, IMP3 and TTF1 immunocytochemistry (ICC) and conventional PCR (C-PCR) in pleural effusion. HE, Hematoxylin & Eosin staining.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Heffner JE. Diagnosis and management of malignant pleural effusions. Respirology. 2008;13:5–20. - PubMed
    1. Hsieh TC, Huang WW, Lai CL, Tsao SM, Su CC. Diagnostic value of tumor markers in lung adenocarcinoma-associated cytologically negative pleural effusions. Cancer Cytopathol. 2013;121:483–8. - PubMed
    1. Metzgeroth G, Kuhn C, Schultheis B, Hehlmann R, Hastka J. Diagnostic accuracy of cytology and immunocytology in carcinomatous effusions. Cytopathology. 2007;19:205–211. - PubMed
    1. Kim JH, Kim GE, Choi YD, Lee JS, Lee JH, Nam JH, Choi C. Immunocytochemical panel for distinguishing between adenocarcinomas and reactive mesothelial cells in effusion cell blocks. Diagn Cytopathol. 2009;37:258–61. - PubMed
    1. Moghaddam NA, Rahmani A, Taheri D, Desfuli MM. Proliferative index using Ki-67 index in reactive mesothelial versus metastatic adenocarcinoma cells in serous fluid. Adv Biomed Res. 2012;1:29. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms