Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Jul;4(3):195-9.
doi: 10.4103/2229-5151.141356.

Procalcitonin versus C-reactive protein: Usefulness as biomarker of sepsis in ICU patient

Waheeda Nargis  1 , Md Ibrahim  2 , Borhan Uddin Ahamed  3
Affiliations

Procalcitonin versus C-reactive protein: Usefulness as biomarker of sepsis in ICU patient

Waheeda Nargis et al. Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci. 2014 Jul.

Abstract

Background: Early diagnosis and appropriate therapy of sepsis is a daily challenge in intensive care units (ICUs) despite the advances in critical care medicine. Procalcitonin (PCT); an innovative laboratory marker, has been recently proven valuable worldwide in this regard.

Objectives: This study was undertaken to evaluate the utility of PCT in a resource constrained country like ours when compared to the traditional inflammatory markers like C - reactive protein (CRP) to introduce PCT as a routine biochemical tool in regional hospitals.

Materials and methods: PCT and CRP were simultaneously measured and compared in 73 medico-surgical ICU patients according to the American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) criteria based study groups.

Results: The clinical presentation of 75% cases revealed a range of systemic inflammatory responses (SIRS). The diagnostic accuracy of PCT was higher (75%) with greater specificity (72%), sensitivity (76%), positive and negative predictive values (89% and 50%), positive likelihood ratio (2.75) as well as the smaller negative likelihood ratio (0.33). Both serum PCT and CRP values in cases with sepsis, severe sepsis and septic shock were significantly higher from that of the cases with SIRS and no SIRS (P < 0.01).

Conclusion: PCT is found to be superior to CRP in terms of accuracy in identification and to assess the severity of sepsis even though both markers cannot be used in differentiating infectious from noninfectious clinical syndrome.

Keywords: C - reactive protein; procalcitonin; systemic inflammatory response syndrome.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Distribution of the study subjects according to their clinical presentation
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Pfafflin A, Schleicher E. Inflammation markers in point-of-care testing (POCT) Anal Bioanal Chem. 2009;393:1473–80. - PubMed
    1. American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine Consensus Conference: Definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis. Crit Care Med. 1992;20:864–74. - PubMed
    1. Levy MM, Fink MP, Marshall JC, Abraham E, Angus D, Cook D, et al. 2001 SCCM/ESICM/ACCP/ATS/SIS International Sepsis Definitions Conference. Crit Care Med. 2003;31:1250–6. - PubMed
    1. Mitaka C. Clinical laboratory differentiation of infectious versus noninfectious systemic inflammatory response syndrome. Clin Chim Acta. 2005;351:17–29. - PubMed
    1. Meisner M. Pathobiochemistry and clinical use of procalcitonin. Clin Chim Acta. 2002;323:17–29. - PubMed