Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Oct 21;11(10):11004-14.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph111011004.

Screening for infectious diseases among newly arrived migrants in EU/EEA countries--varying practices but consensus on the utility of screening

Affiliations

Screening for infectious diseases among newly arrived migrants in EU/EEA countries--varying practices but consensus on the utility of screening

Tommi Kärki et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

Screening is one possible tool for monitoring infectious diseases among migrants. However, there is limited information on screening programmes targeted for newly arrived migrants in EU/EEA countries. Our aim was to investigate the implementation, practices and usefulness of these programmes. We conducted a survey among country experts from EU/EEA countries and Switzerland, asking whether their countries had implemented screening programmes. We also estimated the association between the implementation of these programmes and the rate of asylum-seekers in the population. Of the countries, 16 (59%) had implemented screening programmes and 15 (56%) had national guidelines. The rate of asylum-seekers was associated with implementation of screening programmes (p = 0.014). Screening was performed most often for tuberculosis; most commonly on holding level, and was targeted to specific migrant groups in over half of the countries performing screening. Twenty-five of all the country experts (96%) considered screening among migrants useful, and 24 (92%) would welcome EU level guidelines for screening. The implementation of screening programmes varied, and the practices were different among countries. Our survey suggests, that establishing EU level guidelines for screening would be useful, although they would have to take into account differences between individual countries.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Infectious diseases screened for in countries with implemented screening programmes (n = 15).
Figure 2
Figure 2
The level for screening for each infectious disease in countries with implemented screening programmes (n = 15).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Expert opinions on the usefulness of screening and of potential actions taken on international level (n = 26).

References

    1. Vasileva K. 6.5% of the EU population are foreigners and 9.4% are born abroad. Eurostat. Stat. Focus. 2011;34:1–8.
    1. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) Migrant Health: Background Note to the “ECDC Report on Migration and Infectious Diseases in the EU”. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control; Stockholm, Sweden: 2009.
    1. International Organization for Migration (IOM) World Migration Report 2010: The Future of Migration: Building Capacities for Change. International Organization for Migration; Geneva, Switzerland: 2010.
    1. Riccardo F., Napoli C., Bella A., Rizzo C., Rota M.C., Dente M.G., de Santis S., Declich S. Syndromic surveillance of epidemic-prone diseases in response to an influx of migrants from North Africa to Italy, May to October 2011. [(accessed on 17 November 2011)];EuroSurveillance. 2011 16 Available online: http://www.eurosurveillance.org/ViewArticle.aspx?ArticleId=20016. - PubMed
    1. Rechel B., Mladovsky P., Ingleby D., Mackenbach J.P., McKee M. Migration and health in an increasingly diverse Europe. Lancet. 2013;381:1235–1245. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)62086-8. - DOI - PubMed