Provision or good genes? Menstrual cycle shifts in women's preferences for short-term and long-term mates' altruistic behavior
- PMID: 25340679
- PMCID: PMC10429081
- DOI: 10.1177/147470491401200503
Provision or good genes? Menstrual cycle shifts in women's preferences for short-term and long-term mates' altruistic behavior
Abstract
Men's altruism may have evolved, via female choice, as a signal of either their genetic quality or their willingness to allocate resources to offspring. The possibility that men display altruism to signal their genetic quality may be tested by examining women's preference for men's altruism across the stages of the menstrual cycle. Because women can maximize reproductive benefits by mating with men who have "good genes" on high-fertility versus low-fertility days, women should show a heightened preference for male altruism on high-fertility days compared to low-fertility days, and this heightened preference should be more apparent when women evaluate men for short-term sexual relationships than for long-term committed relationships. The possibility that men display altruism to signal their willingness to provision, as opposed to their genetic quality, may be tested by examining women's preference for men's altruism toward different recipients. More specifically, altruistic behavior toward family members may reflect a willingness to provide resources for kin and, hence, willingness to provision, whereas altruistic behavior toward strangers may function as an honest signal of genetic quality. In two samples of young women (Ns = 131 and 481), we found no differences between high- and low-fertility participants in preference for men's altruism, and women preferred men's altruism more in long-term than short-term relationships. The findings suggest that men's altruistic behavior functions as a signal of willingness to provide resources rather than genetic quality.
Figures
References
-
- Barclay P. (2010). Altruism as a courtship display: Some effects of third-party generosity on audience perceptions. British Journal of Psychology, 101, 123–135. - PubMed
-
- Bereczkei T., Voros S., Gal A., Bernath L. (1997), Resources, attractiveness, family commitment: Reproductive decisions in human mate choice. Ethology, 103, 681–699. - PubMed
-
- Brase G. L. (2006). Cues of parental investment as a factor in attractiveness. Evolution and Human Behavior, 27, 145–157.
-
- Buss D. M., Schmitt D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100, 204–232. - PubMed
-
- Farrelly D. (2011). Cooperation as a signal of genetic or phenotypic quality in female mate choice? Evidence from preferences across the menstrual cycle. British Journal of Psychology, 102, 406–430. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous