Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2014 Oct 24:14:296.
doi: 10.1186/s12888-014-0296-6.

Ten year outcomes of participants in the REACT (Randomised Evaluation of Assertive Community Treatment in North London) study

Helen Killaspy  1 , Laia Mas-Expósito, Louise Marston, Michael King
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Ten year outcomes of participants in the REACT (Randomised Evaluation of Assertive Community Treatment in North London) study

Helen Killaspy et al. BMC Psychiatry. .

Abstract

Background: A previous randomised controlled trial that investigated Assertive Community Treatment (ACT) in the UK (the REACT Study) found no clinical advantage over usual care delivered by Community Mental Health Teams (CMHTs) at 18 and 36 month follow-ups. No studies have investigated long term clinical and social outcomes for patients receiving ACT.

Method: We investigated inpatient service use, social outcomes, service contact and adverse events for the 251 REACT study participants 10 years after randomisation through case note review. Data were analysed using regression models adjusted for original treatment group allocation and changes in treatment group.

Results: We found no statistically significant differences in outcomes by original treatment group over the 10 years. Those whose care remained with ACT, or transferred to ACT or forensic services, had more inpatient days over the 10 years (coefficient 223, 95% CI 83 to 363, p = 0.002) than those whose care remained with the CMHTs or were discharged to primary care. Being subject to a Community Treatment Order was associated with a greater chance of being under ACT at 10 year follow-up (OR 6.39, 95% CI 2.98 to 13.70, p <0.001).

Conclusions: The ACT teams in this study showed no clinical advantage over usual care provided by CMHTs at 10 year follow-up. We also found that the ACT teams accrued patients from the original study sample who had more complex needs than those who remained with or transferred to the CMHTs or primary care during this period. Further well conducted trials are needed to identify the most cost-effective approaches to supporting successful community living and optimum long term outcomes for this group.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
REACT study participant flows 10 years after randomisation.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Department of Health . National Service Framework for Mental Health. London: DH; 1999.
    1. Department of Health . Mental Health Policy Implementation Guide. London: DH; 2001.
    1. Dieterich M, Irving CB, Park B, Marshall M. Intensive case management for severe mental illness. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;10:CD007906. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Burns T, Catty J, Dash M, Roberts C, Lockwood A, Marshall M. Use of intensive case management to reduce time in hospital in people with severe mental illness: systematic review and meta-regression. BMJ. 2007;335:336. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39251.599259.55. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Killaspy H, Bebbington P, Blizard R, Johnson S, Nolan F, Pilling S, King M. REACT: A Randomised Evaluation of Assertive Community Treatment in North London. BMJ. 2006;332:815–819. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38773.518322.7C. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types