Assessment of forearm and plantar foot load in the elderly using a four-wheeled walker with armrest and the effect of armrest height
- PMID: 25342894
- PMCID: PMC4205114
- DOI: 10.2147/CIA.S70722
Assessment of forearm and plantar foot load in the elderly using a four-wheeled walker with armrest and the effect of armrest height
Abstract
Background: Patients with hand and/or wrist pathology are recommended to have a four-wheeled walker with an arm rest (FWW-AR) rather than a standard walker or a standard four-wheeled walker (FWW). However, only a few quantitative studies have been performed to compare upper and lower extremity weight bearing. The aim of this study was to evaluate forearm and foot weight bearing using a FWW-AR and the effect of the armrest height.
Methods: Eleven elderly women (mean age 80.1±5.3 years; mean height 148.5±4.0 cm; mean weight 51.2±9.0 kg) were enrolled. The subjects walked with an FWW-AR, with the elbow in either 90 degree (D90) or 130 degree (D130) flexion, for a distance of 10 m. Surface electromyographic signals were recorded for the upper, middle, and lower trapezius, anterior deltoid, and erector spinae muscles; walking velocity was measured with the subjects weight bearing on their feet and forearms while walking. Simultaneously, the maximum plantar and forearm loads during walking with an FWW-AR were measured.
Results: The normalized foot plantar loads were lower at D90 than at D130, while the normalized forearm load was higher at D90 than at D130 (all P<0.05; left foot, 7.9±0.1 N/kg versus 8.8±0.1 N/kg; right foot, 8.6±0.2 N/kg versus. 9.6±0.1 N/kg; left forearm, 1.8±0.5 N/kg versus 0.8±0.2 N/kg; and right forearm, 2.0±0.5 N/kg versus 1.0±0.2 N/kg, respectively). The surface electromyographic activity of the muscles involved in shoulder elevation and the walking velocity were both lower with the elbow at D90 than at D130 (all P<0.05; left upper trapezius, 98.7%±19.5% versus 132.6%±16.9%; right upper trapezius, 83.4%±10.6% versus 108.1%±10.5%; left anterior deltoid, 94.1%±12.8% versus 158.6%±40.4%; right anterior deltoid, 99.1%±15.0% versus 151.9%±19.4%; and velocity, 0.6±0.1 m/sec versus 0.7±0.1 m/sec, respectively).
Conclusion: Weight bearing on the lower extremities is significantly reduced when the upper extremities are supported during walking with an FWW-AR. Furthermore, the weight bearing profile is dependent on the armrest height.
Keywords: armrest height; forearm; four-wheeled walker with armrest; plantar foot; weight bearing.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Postural and Metabolic Benefits of Using a Forearm Support Walker in Older Adults With Impairments.Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019 Apr;100(4):638-647. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2018.10.001. Epub 2018 Oct 24. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019. PMID: 30367875 Clinical Trial.
-
Effects of balance ability and handgrip height on kinematics of the gait, torso, and pelvis in elderly women using a four-wheeled walker.Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2015 Feb;15(2):182-8. doi: 10.1111/ggi.12246. Epub 2014 Feb 24. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2015. PMID: 24612309
-
Leg muscle activity during walking with assistive devices at varying levels of weight bearing.Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004 Sep;85(9):1555-60. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2003.09.011. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004. PMID: 15375835
-
Contributions to the understanding of gait control.Dan Med J. 2014 Apr;61(4):B4823. Dan Med J. 2014. PMID: 24814597 Review.
-
Walkers with Wheels Versus Walkers Without Wheels for Fall Prevention in Older Adults: A Review of the Comparative Clinical Effectiveness [Internet].Ottawa (ON): Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health; 2019 Jul 22. Ottawa (ON): Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health; 2019 Jul 22. PMID: 31545569 Free Books & Documents. Review.
Cited by
-
Rollator usage lets young individuals switch movement strategies in sit-to-stand and stand-to-sit tasks.Sci Rep. 2023 Oct 6;13(1):16901. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-43401-6. Sci Rep. 2023. PMID: 37803010 Free PMC article.
-
Evaluating Gait Stability and Muscle Activation in Different Hand Holding Conditions Using the Robotic Walker-mTPAD.Sensors (Basel). 2023 Jun 28;23(13):5996. doi: 10.3390/s23135996. Sensors (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37447845 Free PMC article.
-
The central nervous system adjusts muscle synergy structure and tightly controls rollator-supported transitions between sitting and standing.J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2025 Apr 25;22(1):96. doi: 10.1186/s12984-025-01622-y. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2025. PMID: 40281643 Free PMC article.
-
The effects of walking aids on shoulder joint kinematics in older persons: an initial study.BMC Geriatr. 2023 Nov 15;23(1):743. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-04439-3. BMC Geriatr. 2023. PMID: 37964210 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Bateni H, Maki BE. Assistive devices for balance and mobility: benefits, demands, and adverse consequences. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86(1):134–145. - PubMed
-
- Van Hook FW, Demonbreun D, Weiss BD. Ambulatory devices for chronic gait disorders in the elderly. Am Fam Physician. 2003;67(8):1717–1724. - PubMed
-
- Yeh HC. Elderly People’s Use of and Attitudes Towards Assistive Devices. Brisbane, Australia: Queensland University of Technology; 2009.
-
- Pardo RD, Deathe AB, Winter DA. Walker user risk index. A method for quantifying stability in walker users. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1993;72(5):301–305. - PubMed
-
- Cetin E, Muzembo J, Pardessus V, Puisieux F, Thevenon A. Impact of different types of walking aids on the physiological energy cost during gait for elderly individuals with several pathologies and dependent on a technical aid for walking. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2010;53(6):399–405. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials