Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2014 Jul 8:5:2041731414541850.
doi: 10.1177/2041731414541850. eCollection 2014.

Strategies for osteochondral repair: Focus on scaffolds

Affiliations
Review

Strategies for osteochondral repair: Focus on scaffolds

Seog-Jin Seo et al. J Tissue Eng. .

Abstract

Interest in osteochondral repair has been increasing with the growing number of sports-related injuries, accident traumas, and congenital diseases and disorders. Although therapeutic interventions are entering an advanced stage, current surgical procedures are still in their infancy. Unlike other tissues, the osteochondral zone shows a high level of gradient and interfacial tissue organization between bone and cartilage, and thus has unique characteristics related to the ability to resist mechanical compression and restoration. Among the possible therapies, tissue engineering of osteochondral tissues has shown considerable promise where multiple approaches of utilizing cells, scaffolds, and signaling molecules have been pursued. This review focuses particularly on the importance of scaffold design and its role in the success of osteochondral tissue engineering. Biphasic and gradient composition with proper pore configurations are the basic design consideration for scaffolds. Surface modification is an essential technique to improve the scaffold function associated with cell regulation or delivery of signaling molecules. The use of functional scaffolds with a controllable delivery strategy of multiple signaling molecules is also considered a promising therapeutic approach. In this review, we updated the recent advances in scaffolding approaches for osteochondral tissue engineering.

Keywords: Osteochondral repair; interfacial tissue; scaffold design; therapeutic functions; tissue engineering.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of conflicting interests: The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Cross section of osteochondral tissue.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Schematic illustration of cell–cell contact and cell–matrix contact in the cell-laden biphasic scaffold resulting from the strategy used to stabilize the mechanical property and to integrate the interfaces of each phase.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Spatiotemporal delivery from a biphasic scaffold containing therapeutic molecule–loaded microspheres with different degradation rates.,

References

    1. Redman S, Oldfield S, Archer C. Current strategies for articular cartilage repair. Eur Cell Mater 2005; 9: 23–32. - PubMed
    1. Grande DA, Breitbart AS, Mason J, et al. Cartilage tissue engineering: current limitations and solutions. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1999; 367: S176–S185. - PubMed
    1. Patel KH, Nayyer L, Seifalian AM. Chondrogenic potential of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells on a novel, auricular-shaped, nanocomposite scaffold. J Tissue Eng 2013; 4: 2041731413516782. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chen G, Sato T, Ushida T, et al. Tissue engineering of cartilage using a hybrid scaffold of synthetic polymer and collagen. Tissue Eng 2004; 10: 323–330. - PubMed
    1. Dai W, Kawazoe N, Lin X, et al. The influence of structural design of PLGA/collagen hybrid scaffolds in cartilage tissue engineering. Biomaterials 2010; 31: 2141–2152. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources