Building a robust 21st century chemical testing program at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: recommendations for strengthening scientific engagement
- PMID: 25343778
- PMCID: PMC4286280
- DOI: 10.1289/ehp.1408601
Building a robust 21st century chemical testing program at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: recommendations for strengthening scientific engagement
Abstract
Background: Biological pathway-based chemical testing approaches are central to the National Research Council's vision for 21st century toxicity testing. Approaches such as high-throughput in vitro screening offer the potential to evaluate thousands of chemicals faster and cheaper than ever before and to reduce testing on laboratory animals. Collaborative scientific engagement is important in addressing scientific issues arising in new federal chemical testing programs and for achieving stakeholder support of their use.
Objectives: We present two recommendations specifically focused on increasing scientific engagement in the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) ToxCast™ initiative. Through these recommendations we seek to bolster the scientific foundation of federal chemical testing efforts such as ToxCast™ and the public health decisions that rely upon them.
Discussion: Environmental Defense Fund works across disciplines and with diverse groups to improve the science underlying environmental health decisions. We propose that the U.S. EPA can strengthen the scientific foundation of its new chemical testing efforts and increase support for them in the scientific research community by a) expanding and diversifying scientific input into the development and application of new chemical testing methods through collaborative workshops, and b) seeking out mutually beneficial research partnerships.
Conclusions: Our recommendations provide concrete actions for the U.S. EPA to increase and diversify engagement with the scientific research community in its ToxCast™ initiative. We believe that such engagement will help ensure that new chemical testing data are scientifically robust and that the U.S. EPA gains the support and acceptance needed to sustain new testing efforts to protect public health.
Conflict of interest statement
H.C.D. works as a consultant to the EDF. The other authors declare they have no actual or potential competing financial interests.
Comment in
-
ToxCast™ wants you: recommendations for engaging the broader scientific community.Environ Health Perspect. 2015 Jan;123(1):A20. doi: 10.1289/ehp.123-A20. Environ Health Perspect. 2015. PMID: 25561607 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Bucher JR. Regulatory forum opinion piece: Tox21 and toxicologic pathology. Toxicol Pathol. 2013;41:125–127. - PubMed
-
- CBCRP (California Breast Cancer Research Program). Building on National Initiatives for New Chemicals Screening. 2014. Available: http://cbcrp.org.184.seekdotnet.com/research/PageGrant.asp?grant_id=13094 [accessed 10 December 2014]
-
- Denison R. Ten essential elements in TSCA reform. Environ Law Rep 39:10020–10028. 2009. Available: http://www.edf.org/sites/default/files/9279_Denison_10_Elements_TSCA_Ref... [accessed 3 December 2014]
-
- Landrigan PJ, Goldman LR. Chemical safety, health care costs and the Affordable Care Act. Am J Ind Med. 2014;57:1–3. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials
