Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2014 Nov;74(17):1993-2013.
doi: 10.1007/s40265-014-0305-6.

Clinical impact of checkpoint inhibitors as novel cancer therapies

Affiliations
Review

Clinical impact of checkpoint inhibitors as novel cancer therapies

Kent Shih et al. Drugs. 2014 Nov.

Abstract

Immune responses are tightly regulated via signaling through numerous co-stimulatory and co-inhibitory molecules. Exploitation of these immune checkpoint pathways is one of the mechanisms by which tumors evade and/or escape the immune system. A growing understanding of the biology of immune checkpoints and tumor immunology has led to the development of monoclonal antibodies designed to target co-stimulatory and co-inhibitory molecules in order to re-engage the immune system and restore antitumor immune responses. Anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4) antibodies were among the first to be tested in the clinic, and ipilimumab was the first immune checkpoint inhibitor approved for an anticancer indication. Agents targeting the programmed death 1 (PD-1) pathway, either PD-1 or one of its ligands, programmed death ligand 1, are in active clinical development for numerous cancers, including advanced melanoma and lung cancer. Understanding the different mechanisms of action, safety profiles, and response patterns associated with inhibition of the CTLA-4 and PD-1 pathways may improve patient management as these therapies are moved in to the clinical practice setting and may also provide a rationale for combination therapy with different inhibitors. Additional immune checkpoint molecules with therapeutic potential, including lymphocyte activation gene-3 and glucocorticoid-induced tumor necrosis factor receptor-related gene, also have inhibitors in early stages of clinical development. Clinical responses and safety data reported to date on immune checkpoint inhibitors suggest these agents may have the potential to markedly improve outcomes for patients with cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
T-cell activation and immune checkpoint pathways. T-cell activation requires two signals: (1) presentation of antigenic peptides by MHC to the TCR and (2) co-stimulation, typically via CD28:CD80 or CD28:CD86 ligation. Immune checkpoint pathways comprising receptors on T cells and ligands on antigen-presenting cells and/or tumors fine-tune immune responses via T-cell activation or inhibition. CTLA-4 cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4, GAL9 galectin-9, GITR glucocorticoid-induced TNF receptor-related gene, GITRL glucocorticoid-induced TNF receptor-related gene ligand, LAG-3 lymphocyte activation gene-3, MHC major histocompatibility complex, PD-1 programmed death-1, PD-L1 programmed death ligand 1, PD-L2 programmed death ligand 2, TCR T-cell receptor, TIM3 T-cell immunoglobulin and mucin domain 3, TNF tumor necrosis factor
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Inhibiting the CTLA-4 and PD-1 immune checkpoint pathways to restore antitumor immune responses. In peripheral lymphoid organs and tissues, anti-CTLA-4 antibodies block CTLA-4 from binding CD80/86 on APCs and prevent T-cell inhibition. In the tumor microenvironment, PD-L1 and/or PD-L2 expression inhibits PD-1-expressing T cells. Interruption of PD-1:PD-L1 and PD-1:PD-L2 binding by anti-PD-1 antibodies or interruption of PD-1:PD-L1 binding by anti-PD-L1 antibodies restores T-cell immune responses. APC antigen-presenting cell, CTLA-4 cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4, MHC major histocompatibility complex, PD-1 programmed death-1, PD-L1 programmed death ligand 1, PD-L2 programmed death ligand 2, TCR T-cell receptor

References

    1. Balkwill F, Mantovani A. Inflammation and cancer: back to Virchow? Lancet. 2001;357(9255):539–545. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)04046-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bour-Jordan H, Esensten JH, Martinez-Llordella M, et al. Intrinsic and extrinsic control of peripheral T-cell tolerance by costimulatory molecules of the CD28/ B7 family. Immunol Rev. 2011;241(1):180–205. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065X.2011.01011.x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pardoll DM. The blockade of immune checkpoints in cancer immunotherapy. Nat Rev Cancer. 2012;12(4):252–264. doi: 10.1038/nrc3239. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hodi FS, O’Day SJ, McDermott DF, et al. Improved survival with ipilimumab in patients with metastatic melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(8):711–723. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1003466. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Robert C, Thomas L, Bondarenko I, et al. Ipilimumab plus dacarbazine for previously untreated metastatic melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(26):2517–2526. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1104621. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Substances