Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Oct 25:14:491.
doi: 10.1186/s12913-014-0491-7.

Service user involvement: impact and participation: a survey of service user and staff perspectives

Affiliations

Service user involvement: impact and participation: a survey of service user and staff perspectives

Edward Omeni et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Background: Over the last 20 years governments around the world have promoted user involvement in an effort to improve the quality of health services. Despite the growing emphasis placed on user involvement in England, there is a paucity of recent studies looking at how service users and professionals perceive the outcomes of user involvement policies. This study aimed to examine the overall levels of participation in service user involvement in mental health services among professionals and service users and ascertain their views on the impact of involvement activity on various areas of service delivery.

Methods: A cross-sectional survey of service users and providers within community mental health services. The sampling was carried out across three mental health Trusts, two serving people living in inner-city areas and a third covering a mixed rural/urban population. A questionnaire with closed and open ended questions was used to gather the responses of service users and frontline professionals. As a mixed methods study, the analysis consisted of both quantitative and qualitative approaches.

Results: Three hundred and two service users responded to the survey with a response rate of 48%. One hundred and forty three frontline mental health professionals, 26.8% of those approached submitted questionnaires. Almost half of service users (N=138, 45.7%,) and healthcare professionals (N=143, 55.9%) reported having been involved in some form of user involvement activity. Although there were some differences in the responses of service users and frontline professionals, both groups reported that service user involvement was having a positive impact.

Conclusions: The findings show that, within the three mental health trusts examined in this study, service user involvement has become widespread and is perceived by both staff and service users to be a good policy. The study had some important limitations. The questionnaire used was based on existing literature, however it was not subjected to psychometric testing. In addition, response rates were low, particularly among professionals. Despite the limitations, the findings are encouraging, offering important of insight into views and experiences of service users and healthcare staff. Further studies are needed to assess and investigate the topic on a national level.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Professional perceptions about the overall impact of service user involvement on mental health services. *Results are broken down by professional group.

References

    1. Chamberlin J. User/consumer involvement in mental health service delivery. Epidemiol Psichiatr Soc. 2005;14(1):10–14. doi: 10.1017/S1121189X00001871. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Crawford M, Aldridge T, Bhui K, Rutter D, Manley C, Weaver T, Tyrer P, Fulop N. User involvement in the planning and delivery of mental health services: a cross‐sectional survey of service users and providers. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2003;107(6):410–414. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0447.2003.00049.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Thornicroft G, Tansella M. Growing recognition of the importance of service user involvement in mental health service planning and evaluation. Epidemiol Psichiatr Soc. 2005;14(1):1–3. doi: 10.1017/S1121189X00001858. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Department of Health: National service framework for mental health. In. The Stationery Office London; 1999.
    1. Crawford MJ, Rutter D, Manley C, Weaver T, Bhui K, Fulop N, Tyrer P. Systematic review of involving patients in the planning and development of health care. Br Med J. 2002;325(7375):1263. doi: 10.1136/bmj.325.7375.1263. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms