Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2014 Nov;109(8):577-82.
doi: 10.1007/s00063-014-0378-8. Epub 2014 Oct 26.

[First-line anti-infective treatment in sepsis]

[Article in German]
Affiliations
Review

[First-line anti-infective treatment in sepsis]

[Article in German]
H Burgmann. Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2014 Nov.

Abstract

Background: The Surviving Sepsis Campaign strongly recommends that intravenous antibiotic therapy should be started as early as possible, ideally within the first hour of recognition of severe sepsis or septic shock. There is ample evidence that failure to initiate early antimicrobial treatment correlates with increased morbidity and mortality.

Objectives: The purpose of this work was to review the recent literature regarding optimal initial antimicrobial treatment in patients with severe sepsis and sepsis shock.

Materials and methods: A literature review was performed.

Results: The most frequently quoted papers claiming the overriding prognostic importance of early administered antibiotics are retrospective data analyses. However, an equivalent number of studies report that a group of septic patients do not benefit from early administration of antibiotics, but can also be harmed. In these patients, watchful waiting with administration of a targeted antibiotic can be used, thus, avoiding the possible collateral damage from excessive treatment with antibiotics. Treatment with monotherapy is adequate in most cases.

Conclusion: The administration of antibiotics based on the local epidemiology should be initiated quickly in critically ill patients with severe sepsis and septic shock. In patients who are not in septic shock, treatment can be withheld, while awaiting further studies or clinical assessment to confirm the suspicion of infection.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Internist (Berl). 2013 Aug;54(8):925-35 - PubMed
    1. Clin Infect Dis. 2006 Jun 15;42(12):1764-71 - PubMed
    1. Intensive Care Med. 2004 Jul;30(7):1327-33 - PubMed
    1. Crit Care Med. 2014 Aug;42(8):1749-55 - PubMed
    1. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Oct 06;(10):CD007081 - PubMed

Substances

LinkOut - more resources