Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Oct 24;4(10):e006661.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006661.

A protocol for a discrete choice experiment: understanding preferences of patients with cancer towards their cancer care across metropolitan and rural regions in Australia

Affiliations

A protocol for a discrete choice experiment: understanding preferences of patients with cancer towards their cancer care across metropolitan and rural regions in Australia

Shu Fen Wong et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Introduction: Medical decision-making in oncology is a complicated process and to date there are few studies examining how patients with cancer make choices with respect to different features of their care. It is also unknown whether patient choices vary by geographical location and how location could account for observed rural and metropolitan cancer differences. This paper describes an ongoing study that aims to (1) examine patient and healthcare-related factors that influence choices of patients with cancer; (2) measure and quantify preferences of patients with cancer towards cancer care using a discrete choice experiment (DCE) and (3) explore preference heterogeneity between metropolitan and rural locations.

Methods and analysis: A DCE is being conducted to understand how patients with cancer choose between two clinical scenarios accounting for different patient and healthcare-related factors (and levels). Preliminary qualitative research was undertaken to guide the development of an appropriate DCE design including characteristics that are important and relevant to patients with cancer. A fractional factorial design using the D-efficiency criteria was used to estimate interactions among attributes. Multinomial logistic regression will be used for the primary DCE analysis and to control for sociodemographic and clinical characteristics.

Ethics and dissemination: The Barwon Health Human Research Ethics Committee approved the study. Findings from the study will be presented in national/international conferences and peer-reviewed journals. Our results will form the basis of a feasibility study to inform the development of a larger scale study into preferences of patients with cancer and their association with cancer outcomes.

Keywords: HEALTH ECONOMICS; ONCOLOGY; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Key stages for developing a discrete choice experiment.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Structure of a discrete choice task.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Blinman P, King M, Norman R, et al. . Preferences for cancer treatments: an overview of methods and applications in oncology. Ann Oncol 2012;23:1104–10 - PubMed
    1. Gaston CM, Mitchell G. Information giving and decision-making in patients with advanced cancer: a systematic review. Soc Sci Med 2005;61:2252–64 - PubMed
    1. Hol L, de Bekker-Grob EW, van Dam L, et al. . Preferences for colorectal cancer screening strategies: a discrete choice experiment. Br J Cancer 2010;102:972–80 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jansen SJ, Otten W, Stiggelbout AM. Review of determinants of patients’ preferences for adjuvant therapy in cancer. J Clin Oncol 2004;22:3181–90 - PubMed
    1. Befort CA, Nazir N, Engelman K, et al. . Fatalistic cancer beliefs and information sources among rural and urban adults in the USA. J Cancer Educ 2013;28:521–6 - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources