Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Oct 25:15:407.
doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-407.

Systematic techniques for assisting recruitment to trials (START): study protocol for embedded, randomized controlled trials

Affiliations

Systematic techniques for assisting recruitment to trials (START): study protocol for embedded, randomized controlled trials

Jo Rick et al. Trials. .

Abstract

Background: Randomized controlled trials play a central role in evidence-based practice, but recruitment of participants, and retention of them once in the trial, is challenging. Moreover, there is a dearth of evidence that research teams can use to inform the development of their recruitment and retention strategies. As with other healthcare initiatives, the fairest test of the effectiveness of a recruitment strategy is a trial comparing alternatives, which for recruitment would mean embedding a recruitment trial within an ongoing host trial. Systematic reviews indicate that such studies are rare. Embedded trials are largely delivered in an ad hoc way, with interventions almost always developed in isolation and tested in the context of a single host trial, limiting their ability to contribute to a body of evidence with regard to a single recruitment intervention and to researchers working in different contexts.

Methods/design: The Systematic Techniques for Assisting Recruitment to Trials (START) program is funded by the United Kingdom Medical Research Council (MRC) Methodology Research Programme to support the routine adoption of embedded trials to test standardized recruitment interventions across ongoing host trials. To achieve this aim, the program involves three interrelated work packages: (1) methodology - to develop guidelines for the design, analysis and reporting of embedded recruitment studies; (2) interventions - to develop effective and useful recruitment interventions; and (3) implementation - to recruit host trials and test interventions through embedded studies.

Discussion: Successful completion of the START program will provide a model for a platform for the wider trials community to use to evaluate recruitment interventions or, potentially, other types of intervention linked to trial conduct. It will also increase the evidence base for two types of recruitment intervention.

Trial registration: The START protocol covers the methodology for embedded trials. Each embedded trial is registered separately or as a substudy of the host trial.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Exemplar original (left) and optimized (right) participant information sheets [25] .
Figure 2
Figure 2
Web-based platform blank template homepage [42] .
Figure 3
Figure 3
Web-based platform study-specific pages blank template.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Round 1 recruitment outcomes.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. McDonald A, Knight R, Campbell M, Entwistle V, Grant A, Cook J, Elbourne D, Francis D, Garcia J, Roberts I, Snowdon C. What influences recruitment to randomised controlled trials? A review of trials funded by two UK funding agencies. Trials. 2006;7(9):1–8. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bower P, Wilson S, Mathers N. How often do UK primary care trials face recruitment delays? Fam Pract. 2007;24:601–603. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmm051. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sully B, Julious S, Nicholl J. A reinvestigation of recruitment to randomised, controlled, multicenter trials: a review of trials funded by two UK funding agencies. Trials. 2013;14:166. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-166. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Centerwatch . State of the Clinical Trials Industry 2009: A Sourcebook of Charts and Statistics. Boston: CenterWatch; 2009. p. 2009.
    1. Tudur Smith C, Hickey H, Clarke M, Blazeby J, Williamson P. The trials methodological research agenda: results from a priority setting exercise. Trials. 2014;15(32):1–7. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types