A systematic review of single- versus double-bundle ACL reconstruction using the anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction scoring checklist
- PMID: 25344803
- DOI: 10.1007/s00167-014-3393-7
A systematic review of single- versus double-bundle ACL reconstruction using the anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction scoring checklist
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this systematic review was to apply the anatomic ACL reconstruction scoring checklist (AARSC) and to evaluate the degree to which clinical studies comparing single-bundle (SB) and double-bundle (DB) ACL reconstructions are anatomic.
Methods: A systematic electronic search was performed using the databases PubMed (MEDLINE), EMBASE and Cochrane Library. Studies published from January 1995 to January 2014 comparing SB and DB ACL reconstructions with clinical outcome measurements were included. The items from the AARSC were recorded for both the SB and DB groups in each study.
Results: Eight-thousand nine-hundred and ninety-four studies were analysed, 77 were included. Randomized clinical trials (29; 38%) and prospective comparative studies (29; 38%) were the most frequent study type. Most studies were published in 2011 (19; 25%). The most commonly reported items for both SB and DB groups were as follows: graft type (152; 99%), femoral and tibial fixation method (149; 97% respectively), knee flexion angle during graft tensioning (124; 8%) and placement of the tibial tunnel at the ACL insertion site (101; 66%). The highest level of documentation used for ACL tunnel position for both groups was often one dimensional, e.g. drawing, operative notes or o'clock reference. The DB reconstruction was in general more thoroughly reported. The means for the AARSC were 6.9 ± 2.8 for the SB group and 8.3 ± 2.8 for the DB group. Both means were below a proposed required minimum score of 10 for anatomic ACL reconstruction.
Conclusions: There was substantial underreporting of surgical data for both the SB and DB groups in clinical studies. This underreporting creates difficulties when analysing, comparing and pooling results of scientific studies on this subject.
Keywords: AARSC; Anatomic; Anterior cruciate ligament; Reconstruction; Score; Surgical technique.
Similar articles
-
Bioabsorbable versus metallic interference screws for graft fixation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jul 24;7(7):CD009772. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009772.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016. PMID: 27450741 Free PMC article.
-
Anatomical double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction moderately improved tegner scores over the long-term: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023 Feb;31(2):436-448. doi: 10.1007/s00167-022-07046-8. Epub 2022 Jul 15. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023. PMID: 35838793
-
Does Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Improve Postoperative Knee Stability Compared With Single-Bundle Techniques? A Systematic Review of Overlapping Meta-analyses.Arthroscopy. 2015 Jun;31(6):1185-96. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2014.11.014. Epub 2015 Jan 14. Arthroscopy. 2015. PMID: 25595691
-
Double-bundle versus single-bundle reconstruction for anterior cruciate ligament rupture in adults.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Nov 14;11(11):CD008413. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008413.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012. PMID: 23152258 Free PMC article.
-
Surgical versus conservative interventions for treating anterior cruciate ligament injuries.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 3;4(4):CD011166. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011166.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016. PMID: 27039329 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Restoring tibiofemoral alignment during ACL reconstruction results in better knee biomechanics.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018 May;26(5):1367-1374. doi: 10.1007/s00167-017-4742-0. Epub 2017 Oct 24. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018. PMID: 29067474
-
A Systematic Approach for Stronger Documentation of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Graft Choice.Cureus. 2021 Oct 25;13(10):e19017. doi: 10.7759/cureus.19017. eCollection 2021 Oct. Cureus. 2021. PMID: 34824933 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Outcomes of isokinetic tests and functional assessment of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Transtibial versus single anatomic femoral tunnel technique.Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2019 Mar;53(2):86-91. doi: 10.1016/j.aott.2019.01.004. Epub 2019 Feb 8. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2019. PMID: 30745028 Free PMC article.
-
Double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is superior to single-bundle reconstruction in terms of revision frequency: a study of 22,460 patients from the Swedish National Knee Ligament Register.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017 Dec;25(12):3884-3891. doi: 10.1007/s00167-016-4387-4. Epub 2016 Nov 23. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017. PMID: 27882413 Free PMC article.
-
Single-bundle versus double-bundle autologous anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials at 5-year minimum follow-up.J Orthop Surg Res. 2018 Mar 10;13(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s13018-018-0753-x. J Orthop Surg Res. 2018. PMID: 29523208 Free PMC article. Review.
References
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous