Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Jan 6;162(1):11-7.
doi: 10.7326/M14-2255.

Effect of Ebola progression on transmission and control in Liberia

Effect of Ebola progression on transmission and control in Liberia

Dan Yamin et al. Ann Intern Med. .

Abstract

Background: The Ebola outbreak that is sweeping across West Africa is the largest, most volatile, and deadliest Ebola epidemic ever recorded. Liberia is the most profoundly affected country, with more than 3500 infections and 2000 deaths recorded in the past 3 months.

Objective: To evaluate the contribution of disease progression and case fatality on transmission and to examine the potential for targeted interventions to eliminate the disease.

Design: Stochastic transmission model that integrates epidemiologic and clinical data on incidence and case fatality, daily viral load among survivors and nonsurvivors evaluated on the basis of the 2000-2001 outbreak in Uganda, and primary data on contacts of patients with Ebola in Liberia.

Setting: Montserrado County, Liberia, July to September 2014.

Measurements: Ebola incidence and case-fatality records from 2014 Liberian Ministry of Health and Social Welfare.

Results: The average number of secondary infections generated throughout the entire infectious period of a single infected case, R, was estimated as 1.73 (95% CI, 1.66 to 1.83). There was substantial stratification between survivors (RSurvivors), for whom the estimate was 0.66 (CI, 0.10 to 1.69), and nonsurvivors (RNonsurvivors), for whom the estimate was 2.36 (CI, 1.72 to 2.80). The nonsurvivors had the highest risk for transmitting the virus later in the course of disease progression. Consequently, the isolation of 75% of infected individuals in critical condition within 4 days from symptom onset has a high chance of eliminating the disease.

Limitation: Projections are based on the initial dynamics of the epidemic, which may change as the outbreak and interventions evolve.

Conclusion: These results underscore the importance of isolating the most severely ill patients with Ebola within the first few days of their symptomatic phase.

Primary funding source: National Institutes of Health.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosures: Disclosures can be viewed at www.acponline.org/authors/icmje/ConflictOfInterestForms.do?msNum=M14-2255.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Infectivity according to day of infection and survivorship. Top. Distribution of the reproductive number among survivors, RSurvivors, and among nonsurvivors, RNonsurvivors. Middle. Distribution of secondary cases per infected individual among survivors and nonsurvivors. Bottom. Average number of secondary cases per day of symptomatic disease.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Probability of disease elimination for different intervention strategies and coverages. Top. Case isolation of nonsurvivors after symptom onset. Vertical dashed line indicates probability of disease elimination by isolating nonsurvivors within 4 days of symptom onset. Bottom. Percentage self-quarantine on first day of symptom onset. Vertical dashed line indicates probability of disease elimination achieved by a 60% reduction in contacts.

Comment in

  • Effect of Ebola progression in Liberia.
    Mohapatra PR, Mishra B. Mohapatra PR, et al. Ann Intern Med. 2015 May 19;162(10):734. doi: 10.7326/L15-5092. Ann Intern Med. 2015. PMID: 25984853 No abstract available.
  • Effect of Ebola progression in Liberia.
    Burke HB. Burke HB. Ann Intern Med. 2015 May 19;162(10):734. doi: 10.7326/L15-5092-2. Ann Intern Med. 2015. PMID: 25984854 No abstract available.
  • Effect of Ebola progression in Liberia.
    Yamin D, Gertler S, Ndeffo-Mbah ML, Galvani AP. Yamin D, et al. Ann Intern Med. 2015 May 19;162(10):734-5. doi: 10.7326/L15-5092-3. Ann Intern Med. 2015. PMID: 25984855 No abstract available.

References

    1. Ministry of Health and Social Welfare, Republic of Liberia. [on 30 September 2014];Liberia Ebola SitRep. 2014 123 Accessed at www.mohsw.gov.lr/documents/Liberia%20Ebola%20SitRep%20123Sept%2015,%2020....
    1. Althaus C. Estimating the reproduction number of Ebola virus (EBOV) during the 2014 outbreak in West Africa. [on 2 September 2014];PLOS Curr Outbreaks. 2014 Accessed at http://currents.plos.org/outbreaks/article/estimating-the-reproduction-n... - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nishiura H, Chowell G. Early transmission dynamics of Ebola virus disease (EVD), West Africa, March to August 2014. European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC)–Health Comunication Unit. [on 30 September 2014];Eurosurveillance. 2014 19:20894. Accessed at www.eurosurveillance.org/ViewArticle.aspx?ArticleId=20894. - PubMed
    1. Formenty P. Ebola-Marburg viral diseases. In: Heymann DL, editor. Control of Communicable Diseases Manual. Washington, DC: American Public Health Assoc; 2008.
    1. Khan AS, Tshioko FK, Heymann DL, Le Guenno B, Nabeth P, Kerstiëns B, et al. The reemergence of Ebola hemorrhagic fever, Democratic Republic of the Congo, 1995. Commission de Lutte contre les Epidémies à Kikwit. J Infect Dis. 1999;179(Suppl 1):S76–S86. [PMID: 9988168] - PubMed

Publication types