Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 May;23(5):1341-7.
doi: 10.1007/s00520-014-2473-z. Epub 2014 Oct 28.

Evolution of nutritional status in patients with autologous and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant

Affiliations

Evolution of nutritional status in patients with autologous and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant

Romina L Barritta de Defranchi et al. Support Care Cancer. 2015 May.

Abstract

Purpose: To describe the nutritional status in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) in three different defined moments: at admission to the Bone Marrow Transplant Unit (BMTU), at discharge from the BMTU and at follow-up. We hypothesized that nutrition status declines during hospitalization and recovers at follow-up.

Methods: Prospective cohort study. Nutritional status was determined using the patient-generated subjective global assessment (PG-SGA) at three different defined moments: T1, defined as the time of admission to the BMTU; T2, at the time of discharge from the BMTU; and T3, at follow-up appointment 10 days after discharge. PG-SGA score differences were described among T1, T2, and T3. Participants were adults admitted for any type of HSCT to our BMTU from March 2010 to July 2013. One hundred and twenty-three patients were included.

Results: Subjects (94.3 %) were well nourished at T1, but 59.7 % were classified as malnourished at T2. PG-SGA score was 3.39 (±3.47) at T1, 12.3 (±5.6) at T2, and 6.54 (±4.57) at T3 (p < 0.001). During hospitalization, nutritional status deteriorated more in men than women (10.59 vs. 7.93; p = 0.002), in patients with length of hospital stay greater than 21 days (10.64 vs. 8.45, p = 0.034), in patients younger than 60 years (10.7 vs. 6.42; p = 0.0007), and those individuals with allogeneic transplant (12.45 vs. 8.74; p = 0.0152).

Conclusions: Patients undergoing HSCT were well nourished upon admission to the BMTU. Nutritional status significantly declined during hospitalization and improved at follow-up. However, nutritional intervention may still be required.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Clin Nutr. 2000 Dec;19(6):445-9 - PubMed
    1. Haematologica. 2003 Sep;88(9):1044-52 - PubMed
    1. Am J Med. 1997 Mar;102(3):265-8 - PubMed
    1. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2008 Oct;42(7):469-73 - PubMed
    1. Support Care Cancer. 2010 Feb;19(2):187-92 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources