Fake Journals: Not Always Valid Ways to Distinguish Them
- PMID: 25348895
- DOI: 10.1007/s11948-014-9608-y
Fake Journals: Not Always Valid Ways to Distinguish Them
Abstract
In their recent paper, Esfe et al. (Sci Eng Ethics, doi: 10.1007/s11948-014-9595-z 2014) present some criteria for fake journals and propose some 'features' to recognize them. While I share most of the authors' concerns about this issue in general, some of the reported criteria are not fit to differentiate fake journals from genuine ones. Here are some examples derived from their list, which illustrate that such criteria are not necessarily specific to fake journals only, but they could also apply to well-established journals and, therefore, should not be considered as is.
Keywords: Common science pitfall; Fair publication system; Fake journals; Open access; Publication frenzy; Publishing bias; Research misconduct.
Comment on
-
Fake Journals: Their Features and Some Viable Ways to Distinguishing Them.Sci Eng Ethics. 2015 Aug;21(4):821-4. doi: 10.1007/s11948-014-9595-z. Epub 2014 Sep 18. Sci Eng Ethics. 2015. PMID: 25230907
References
-
- Sci Eng Ethics. 2015 Aug;21(4):821-4 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources