Matching doses of distraction with child risk for distress during a medical procedure: a randomized clinical trial
- PMID: 25350539
- PMCID: PMC4282990
- DOI: 10.1097/NNR.0000000000000056
Matching doses of distraction with child risk for distress during a medical procedure: a randomized clinical trial
Abstract
Background: Parents often want to provide support to their children during medical procedures, but not all parents are effective in providing distraction after brief training.
Objective: The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of three doses of distraction intervention for children at high and medium risk for procedure-related distress.
Methods: Children undergoing scheduled intravenous insertions for diagnostic or treatment purposes and their parents participated. A computerized application, Children, Parents and Distraction, was used to predict distress risk. Doses of intervention were basic (parents trained on providing distraction), enhanced (basic training plus tailored instructions, environmental modifications, and support and guidance from the research assistant), and professional (a trained research assistant provided distraction). Outcome measures were Observational Scale of Behavioral Distress-Revised for behavioral distress, Oucher for self-reported pain, parent report of child distress, and salivary cortisol for physiological distress.
Results: A total of 574 children, ages 4-10, and their parents participated. The Children, Parents and Distraction predicted that the risk for distress was high for 156 children, medium for 372, and low for 46. Children predicted to have higher risk for distress displayed more behavioral distress (p < .01). Children in the medium-risk group who had the professional intervention displayed significantly less behavioral distress (p < .001). Children in the high-risk group tended to have less behavioral distress when receiving the professional intervention (p = .07). There were no significant group differences for self-report of pain, parent report of distress, or cortisol levels.
Discussion: Some parents may need additional training in providing distraction to their children during procedures, and some children at medium and high risk for distress may need professional support. Parents should be asked about their preferences in acting as the distraction coach and, if willing, be provided as much training and support as possible in the clinical situation.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have no conflicts of interest to report.
Figures
References
-
- American Academy of Pediatrics. 2014 immunization schedules. 2014 Retrieved from http://www2.aap.org/immunization/izschedule.html.
-
- Aradine CR, Beyer JE, Tompkins JM. Children’s pain perception before and after analgesia: A study of instrument construct validity and related issues. Journal of Pediatric Nursing. 1988;3:11–23. - PubMed
-
- Beyer JE, Aradine CR. Content validity of an instrument to measure young children’s perceptions of the intensity of their pain. Journal of Pediatric Nursing. 1986;1:386–395. - PubMed
-
- Blount RL, Bachanas PJ, Powers SW, Cotter MC, Franklin A, Chaplin W, Blount SD. Training children to cope and parents to coach them during routine immunizations: Effects on child, parent and staff behaviors. Behavior Therapy. 1992;23:689–705.
-
- Bronner MB, Knoester H, Bos AP, Last BF, Gootenhuis MA. Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) in children after paedi-atric intensive care treatment compared to children who survived a major fire disaster. Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health. 2008;2:9. doi: 10.1186/1753-2000-2-9. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical