Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Oct 28:5:5351.
doi: 10.1038/ncomms6351.

Consequences of tropical land use for multitrophic biodiversity and ecosystem functioning

Affiliations

Consequences of tropical land use for multitrophic biodiversity and ecosystem functioning

Andrew D Barnes et al. Nat Commun. .

Abstract

Our knowledge about land-use impacts on biodiversity and ecosystem functioning is mostly limited to single trophic levels, leaving us uncertain about whole-community biodiversity-ecosystem functioning relationships. We analyse consequences of the globally important land-use transformation from tropical forests to oil palm plantations. Species diversity, density and biomass of invertebrate communities suffer at least 45% decreases from rainforest to oil palm. Combining metabolic and food-web theory, we calculate annual energy fluxes to model impacts of land-use intensification on multitrophic ecosystem functioning. We demonstrate a 51% reduction in energy fluxes from forest to oil palm communities. Species loss clearly explains variation in energy fluxes; however, this relationship depends on land-use systems and functional feeding guilds, whereby predators are the most heavily affected. Biodiversity decline from forest to oil palm is thus accompanied by even stronger reductions in functionality, threatening to severely limit the functional resilience of communities to cope with future global changes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Energy fluxes along a conceptual food chain as a measure of multitrophic ecosystem functioning.
Energy flux between two nodes is calculated as formula image, where F is the total energy flux into the network node of a feeding guild (vertical red and yellow arrows), ea is the diet-specific assimilation efficiency (denoted by diagonal arrows arising from the flux arrows), X is the per-unit-mass metabolic demand of the feeding guild (which is nonlinearly dependent on body sizes, temperature and phylogeny) and L is the loss to predation from the node (for the yellow node, this is equal to the flux to the red secondary consumer node). Here we demonstrate three examples where changes in the mean body size (size of black animal icons), biomass (diameter of red and yellow circles) or phylogeny (black animal icons) on any trophic level (here demonstrated by the secondary consumer guild) can result in nonproportionally altered total energy flux (sum of all arrow widths in the food chain).
Figure 2
Figure 2. Effects of land-use transformation on macroinvertebrate communities.
The mean (±s.e., n=32) species richness (a), density (b), biomass (c) and community metabolism (d) of the total community (black points) and of each functional feeding guild (coloured lines) for the four land-use transformation systems: forest (F), jungle rubber (J), rubber (R) and oil palm (O).
Figure 3
Figure 3. Effects of land-use transformation on community energy networks.
Energy networks displaying the relative annual energy flux (coloured arrow width weighted by calculated energy flux (kg ha−1 per year)) and biomass (coloured node diameter weighted by total biomass) among the functional feeding guilds: predators (red), omnivores (blue), detritivores (yellow) and herbivores (green). Each panel represents an energy network for one of the four land-use transformation systems.
Figure 4
Figure 4. Relationship between species richness and community energy fluxes.
Linear mixed effects models for (a) entire communities and (b) separated into functional feeding guilds. Black dashed lines denote overall model fits and coloured lines indicate different land-use transformation systems.

References

    1. Gibbs H. K. et al. Tropical forests were the primary sources of new agricultural land in the 1980s and 1990s. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 16732–16737 (2010). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Díaz S., Fargione J., Chapin F. S. & Tilman D. Biodiversity loss threatens human well-being. PLoS Biol. 4, e277 (2006). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gilbert N. Palm-oil boom raises conservation concerns. Nature 487, 14–15 (2012). - PubMed
    1. Koh L. P. & Wilcove D. S. Cashing in palm oil for conservation. Nature 448, 993–994 (2007). - PubMed
    1. Fitzherbert E. B. et al. How will oil palm expansion affect biodiversity? Trends Ecol. Evol. 23, 538–545 (2008). - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources