Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Oct 15;24(3):376-82.
doi: 10.11613/BM.2014.040. eCollection 2014.

Clinical biochemistry laboratory rejection rates due to various types of preanalytical errors

Affiliations

Clinical biochemistry laboratory rejection rates due to various types of preanalytical errors

Aysenur Atay et al. Biochem Med (Zagreb). .

Abstract

Introduction: Preanalytical errors, along the process from the beginning of test requests to the admissions of the specimens to the laboratory, cause the rejection of samples. The aim of this study was to better explain the reasons of rejected samples, regarding to their rates in certain test groups in our laboratory.

Materials and methods: This preliminary study was designed on the rejected samples in one-year period, based on the rates and types of inappropriateness. Test requests and blood samples of clinical chemistry, immunoassay, hematology, glycated hemoglobin, coagulation and erythrocyte sedimentation rate test units were evaluated. Types of inappropriateness were evaluated as follows: improperly labelled samples, hemolysed, clotted specimen, insufficient volume of specimen and total request errors.

Results: A total of 5,183,582 test requests from 1,035,743 blood collection tubes were considered. The total rejection rate was 0.65 %. The rejection rate of coagulation group was significantly higher (2.28%) than the other test groups (P < 0.001) including insufficient volume of specimen error rate as 1.38%. Rejection rates of hemolysis, clotted specimen and insufficient volume of sample error were found to be 8%, 24% and 34%, respectively. Total request errors, particularly, for unintelligible requests were 32% of the total for inpatients.

Conclusions: The errors were especially attributable to unintelligible requests of inappropriate test requests, improperly labelled samples for inpatients and blood drawing errors especially due to insufficient volume of specimens in a coagulation test group. Further studies should be performed after corrective and preventive actions to detect a possible decrease in rejecting samples.

Keywords: preanalytical error; quality indicator; specimen rejection.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Total number of the samples and rejection rates of each laboratory test units (%). Percentages were calculated as ‘number of rejected samples’/ total number of samples’ of each laboratory test unit. Bars represent actual laboratory data for a 1 year period. ESR - erythrocyte sedimentation rate.

References

    1. Guzel O, Guner EI. ISO 15189 accreditation: Requirements for quality and competence of medical laboratories, experience of a laboratory I. Clin Biochem. 2009;42:274–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2008.09.011. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Shahangian S, Snyder SR. Laboratory medicine quality indicators: a review of the literature. Am J Clin Pathol. 2009;131:418–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1309/AJCPJF8JI4ZLDQUE. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Da Rin G. Pre-analytical workstations: a tool for reducing laboratory errors. Clin Chim Acta. 2009;404:68–74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cca.2009.03.024. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Guder WG. History of the preanalytical phase: a personal view. Biochem Med. 2014;24:25–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.11613/BM.2014.005. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Plebani M. Errors in clinical laboratories or errors in laboratory medicine? Clin Chem Lab Med. 2006;44:750–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/CCLM.2006.123. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms