Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Oct 17:8:355-60.
doi: 10.2174/1874325001408010355. eCollection 2014.

The reliability and validity of the computerized double inclinometer in measuring lumbar mobility

Joy Christine MacDermid  1 , Vanitha Arumugam  2 , Joshua Israel Vincent  2 , Krista L Carroll  3
Affiliations

The reliability and validity of the computerized double inclinometer in measuring lumbar mobility

Joy Christine MacDermid et al. Open Orthop J. .

Abstract

Study design: Repeated measures reliability/validity study.

Objectives: To determine the concurrent validity, test-retest, inter-rater and intra-rater reliability of lumbar flexion and extension measurements using the Tracker M.E. computerized dual inclinometer (CDI) in comparison to the modified-modified Schober (MMS).

Summary of background: Numerous studies have evaluated the reliability and validity of the various methods of measuring spinal motion, but the results are inconsistent. Differences in equipment and techniques make it difficult to correlate results.

Methods: Twenty subjects with back pain and twenty without back pain were selected through convenience sampling. Two examiners measured sagittal plane lumbar range of motion for each subject. Two separate tests with the CDI and one test with the MMS were conducted. Each test consisted of three trials. Instrument and examiner order was randomly assigned. Intra-class correlations (ICCs 2, 2 and 2, 2) and Pearson correlation coefficients (r) were used to calculate reliability and concurrent validity respectively.

Results: Intra-trial reliability was high to very high for both the CDI (ICCs 0.85 - 0.96) and MMS (ICCs 0.84 - 0.98). However, the reliability was poor to moderate, when the CDI unit had to be repositioned either by the same rate (ICCs 0.16 - 0.59) or a different rater (ICCs 0.45 - 0.52). Inter-rater reliability for the MMS was moderate to high (ICCs 0.75 - 0.82) which bettered the moderate correlation obtained for the CDI (ICCs 0.45 - 0.52). Correlations between the CDI and MMS were poor for flexion (0.32; p<0.05) and poor to moderate (-0.42 - -0.51; p<0.05) for extension measurements.

Conclusion: When using the CDI, an average of subsequent tests is required to obtain moderate reliability. The MMS was highly reliable than the CDI. The MMS and the CDI measure lumbar movement on a different metric that are not highly related to each other.

Keywords: Computerized dual inclinometer; construct validity.; low back pain; modified-modified Schober; reliability.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. (1)
Fig. (1)
Measuring lumbar flexion.
Fig. (2)
Fig. (2)
Measuring lumbar extension.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Rondinelli RD, Genovese E, Brigham CR. American Medical Association Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment 6th ed. Chicago American Medical Association. 2008
    1. Mayer TG, Kondraske G, Beals SB, Gatchel RJ. Spinal range of motion.Accuracy and sources of error with inclinometric measurement. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997;22(17):1976,–84. - PubMed
    1. Nitschke JE, Nattrass CL, Disler PB, Chou MJ, Ooi KT. Reliability of the American Medical Association guides' model for measuring spinal range of motion.Its implication for whole-person impairment rating. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999;24(3):262–8. - PubMed
    1. Saur PM, Ensink FB, Frese K, Seeger D, Hildebrandt J. Lumbar range of motion reliability and validity of the inclinometer technique in the clinical measurement of trunk flexibility. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1996;21(11):1332–8. - PubMed
    1. Williams R, Binkley J, Bloch R, Goldsmith CH, Minuk T. Reliability of the modified-modified Schober and double inclinometer methods for measuring lumbar flexion and extension. PhysTher. 1993;73(1):33–44. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources