Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Oct 29;2(4):e47.
doi: 10.2196/mhealth.3745.

Preferences for a Mobile HIV Prevention App for Men Who Have Sex With Men

Tamar Goldenberg  1 , Sarah J McDougal, Patrick S Sullivan, Joanne D Stekler, Rob Stephenson
Affiliations

Preferences for a Mobile HIV Prevention App for Men Who Have Sex With Men

Tamar Goldenberg et al. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. .

Abstract

Background: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommends that sexually active men who have sex with men (MSM) in the United States test for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) at least three times per year, but actual testing frequency is much less frequent. Though mHealth is a popular vehicle for delivering HIV interventions, there are currently no mobile phone apps that target MSM with the specific aim of building an HIV testing plan, and none that focuses on developing a comprehensive prevention plan and link MSM to additional HIV prevention and treatment resources. Previous research has suggested a need for more iterative feedback from the target population to ensure use of these interventions.

Objective: The purpose of this study is to understand MSM's preferences for functionality, format, and design of a mobile phone-based HIV prevention app and to examine MSM's willingness to use an app for HIV prevention.

Methods: We conducted focus group discussions with 38 gay and bisexual men, with two in-person groups in Atlanta, two in Seattle, and one online focus group discussion with gay and bisexual men in rural US regions. These discussions addressed MSM's general preferences for apps, HIV testing barriers and facilitators for MSM, and ways that an HIV prevention app could address these barriers and facilitators to increase the frequency of HIV testing and prevention among MSM. During focus group discussions, participants were shown screenshots and provided feedback on potential app functions.

Results: Participants provided preferences on functionality of the app, including the type and delivery of educational content, the value of interactive engagement, and the importance of social networking as an app component. Participants also discussed preferences on how the language should be framed for the delivery of information, identifying that an app needs to be simultaneously fun and professional. Privacy and altruistic motivation were considered to be important factors in men's willingness to use a mobile HIV prevention app. Finally, men described the potential impact that a mobile HIV prevention app could have, identifying individual, interpersonal, and community-based benefits.

Conclusions: In summary, participants described a comprehensive app that should incorporate innovative ideas to educate and engage men so that they would be motivated to use the app. In order for an app to be useful, it needs to feel safe and trustworthy, which is essential when considering the app's language and privacy. Participants provided a range of preferences for using an HIV prevention app, including what they felt MSM need with regards to HIV prevention and what they want in order to engage with an app. Making an HIV prevention app enjoyable and usable for MSM is a difficult challenge. However, the usability of the app is vital because no matter how great the intervention, if MSM do not use the app, then it will not be useful.

Keywords: HIV; HIV prevention; MSM; mHealth; mobile phone app.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Screenshot for creating a testing plan.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Screenshot for location-based reminders for HIV testing.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Screenshot for rating and reviewing HIV testing centers and other venues.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Screenshot for tracking of sexual behaviors.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Screenshot for HIV testing documentation.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention HIV Surveillance Supplemental Report. 2012. [2014-10-16]. Estimated HIV Incidence in the United States, 2007-2010 http://www.cdc.gov/hiv/pdf/statistics_hssr_vol_17_no_4.pdf.
    1. Oster AM, Johnson CH, Le BC, Balaji AB, Finlayson TJ, Lansky A, Mermin J, Valleroy L, Mackellar D, Behel S, Paz-Bailey G. Trends in HIV prevalence and HIV testing among young MSM: five United States cities, 1994-2011. AIDS Behav. 2014 Apr;18 Suppl 3:S237–47. doi: 10.1007/s10461-013-0566-1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gardner EM, McLees MP, Steiner JF, Del Rio C, Burman WJ. The spectrum of engagement in HIV care and its relevance to test-and-treat strategies for prevention of HIV infection. Clin Infect Dis. 2011 Mar 15;52(6):793–800. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciq243. http://www.cid.oxfordjournals.org/cgi/pmidlookup?view=long&pmid=21367734 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Khosropour CM, Sullivan PS. At-home HIV testing of MSM enrolled in an online HIV behavioral risk study. National HIV Prevention Conference; 2011; Atlanta, GA. 2011.
    1. Sullivan PS, Carballo-Diéguez A, Coates T, Goodreau SM, McGowan I, Sanders EJ, Smith A, Goswami P, Sanchez J. Successes and challenges of HIV prevention in men who have sex with men. Lancet. 2012 Jul 28;380(9839):388–99. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60955-6. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/22819659 - DOI - PMC - PubMed