Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Feb;147(2):295-303.
doi: 10.1378/chest.14-2500.

Components necessary for high-quality lung cancer screening: American College of Chest Physicians and American Thoracic Society Policy Statement

Affiliations

Components necessary for high-quality lung cancer screening: American College of Chest Physicians and American Thoracic Society Policy Statement

Peter Mazzone et al. Chest. 2015 Feb.

Abstract

Lung cancer screening with a low-dose chest CT scan can result in more benefit than harm when performed in settings committed to developing and maintaining high-quality programs. This project aimed to identify the components of screening that should be a part of all lung cancer screening programs. To do so, committees with expertise in lung cancer screening were assembled by the Thoracic Oncology Network of the American College of Chest Physicians (CHEST) and the Thoracic Oncology Assembly of the American Thoracic Society (ATS). Lung cancer program components were derived from evidence-based reviews of lung cancer screening and supplemented by expert opinion. This statement was developed and modified based on iterative feedback of the committees. Nine essential components of a lung cancer screening program were identified. Within these components 21 Policy Statements were developed and translated into criteria that could be used to assess the qualification of a program as a screening facility. Two additional Policy Statements related to the need for multisociety governance of lung cancer screening were developed. High-quality lung cancer screening programs can be developed within the presented framework of nine essential program components outlined by our committees. The statement was developed, reviewed, and formally approved by the leadership of CHEST and the ATS. It was subsequently endorsed by the American Association of Throacic Surgery, American Cancer Society, and the American Society of Preventive Oncology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1 –
Figure 1 –
Most efficient strategies based on modeling performed for the US Preventive Services Task Force. All used an annual strategy. Estimated lung cancer mortality reduction (average of five models) from annual CT scan screening in the 1950 birth cohort for programs with eligible ages of 55 to 80 years and different smoking eligibility cutoffs. A = annual; LC = lung cancer.

References

    1. Bach PB, Mirkin JN, Oliver TK, et al. Benefits and harms of CT screening for lung cancer: a systematic review. JAMA. 2012;307(22):2418-2429. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Detterbeck FC, Mazzone PJ, Naidich DF, Bach PB. Screening for lung cancer. Diagnosis and management of lung cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians evidence-based clinical practice guidelines. Chest 2013;143(5_suppl):e78S-e92S. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Moyer VA; US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for lung cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2014;160(5):330-338. - PubMed
    1. Aberle DR, Adams AM, Berg CD, et al. ; National Lung Screening Trial Research Team. Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. N Engl J Med. 2011;365(5):395-409. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Benefits and harms of computed tomography lung cancer screening programs for high-risk populations. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2013. AHRQ Publication No. 13-05196-EF-2.

Publication types

MeSH terms