Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Nov;27(11):1600-7.
doi: 10.5713/ajas.2014.14356.

Protected organic Acid blends as an alternative to antibiotics in finishing pigs

Affiliations

Protected organic Acid blends as an alternative to antibiotics in finishing pigs

S D Upadhaya et al. Asian-Australas J Anim Sci. 2014 Nov.

Abstract

A total of 120 finishing pigs ([Yorkshire×Landrace]×Duroc) with an average body weight (BW) of 49.72 ±1.72 kg were used in 12-wk trial to evaluate the effects of protected organic acids on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, fecal micro flora, meat quality and fecal gas emission. Pigs were randomly allotted to one of three dietary treatments (10 replication pens with 4 pigs per pen) in a randomly complete block design based on their initial BW. Each dietary treatment consisted of: Control (CON/basal diet), OA1 (basal diet+0.1% organic acids) and OA2 (basal diet+0.2% organic acids). Dietary treatment with protected organic acid blends linearly improved (p<0.001) average daily gain during 0 to 6 week, 6 to 12 week as well as overall with the increase in their inclusion level in the diet. The dry matter, N, and energy digestibility was higher (linear effect, p<0.001) with the increase in the dose of protected organic acid blends during 12 week. During week 6, a decrease (linear effect, p = 0.01) in fecal ammonia contents was observed with the increase in the level of protected organic acid blends on d 3 and d 5 of fermentation. Moreover, acetic acid emission decreased linearly (p = 0.02) on d7 of fermentation with the increase in the level of protected organic acid blends. During 12 weeks, linear decrease (p<0.001) in fecal ammonia on d 3 and d 5 and acetic acid content on d 5 of fermentation was observed with the increase in the level of protected organic acid blends. Supplementation of protected organic acid blends linearly increased the longissimus muscle area with the increasing concentration of organic acids. Moreover, color of meat increased (linear effect, quadratic effect, p<0.001, p<0.002 respectively) and firmness of meat showed quadratic effect (p = 0.003) with the inclusion of increasing level of protected organic acid in the diet. During the 6 week, increment in the level of protected organic acid blends decreased (linear effect, p = 0.01) Escherichia coli (E. coli) counts and increased (linear effect, p = 0.004) Lactobacillus counts. During 12-wk of experimental trial, feces from pigs fed diet supplemented with organic acid blends showed linear reduction (p<0.001) of E. coli counts and the tendency of linear increase (p = 0.06) in Lactobacillus count with the increase in the level of organic acid blends. In conclusion, 0.2% protected organic acids blends positively affected growth performance, nutrient digestibility, fecal gas emission and meat quality in finishing pigs without any adverse effects on blood parameters.

Keywords: Digestibility; Finishing Pigs; Growth Performance; Micro Flora; Protected Organic Acids.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Ahmed ST, Hwang JA, Hoon J, Mun HS, Yang CJ. Comparison of single and blend of acidifiers as an alternative to antibiotics on growth performance, fecal microflora and humoral immunity in weaned piglets. Asian Australas J Anim Sci. 2014;27:93–100. - PMC - PubMed
    1. AOAC. Official Methods of Analysis. 17th ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists; Gaithersburg, MD, USA: 2000.
    1. Argenzio RA, Eisemann J. Mechanisms of acid injury in porcine gastroesophageal mucosa. Am J Vet Res. 1996;57:564–573. - PubMed
    1. Bearson S, Bearson B, Foster JW. Acid stress responses in enterobacteria. FEMS Microb Lett. 1997;147:173–180. - PubMed
    1. Berg EP. Pork composition and quality assessment procedures. National Pork Producers Council (NPPC); Des Monies, IA, USA: 2000. pp. 1–38.

LinkOut - more resources