Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015;18(1):26-39.
doi: 10.1159/000366128. Epub 2014 Oct 30.

Testing an online, dynamic consent portal for large population biobank research

Daniel B Thiel  1 , Jodyn Platt, Tevah Platt, Susan B King, Nicole Fisher, Robert Shelton, Sharon L R Kardia
Affiliations

Testing an online, dynamic consent portal for large population biobank research

Daniel B Thiel et al. Public Health Genomics. 2015.

Abstract

Background: Michigan's BioTrust for Health, a public health research biobank comprised of residual dried bloodspot (DBS) cards from newborn screening contains over 4 million samples collected without written consent. Participant-centric initiatives are IT tools that hold great promise to address the consent challenges in biobank research.

Methods: Working with Private Access Inc., a pioneer in patient-centric web solutions, we created and pilot tested a dynamic informed consent simulation, paired with an educational website, focusing on consent for research utilizing DBSs in Michigan's BioTrust for Health.

Results: Out of 187 pilot testers recruited in 2 groups, 137 completed the consent simulation and exit survey. Over 50% indicated their willingness to set up an account if the simulation went live and to recommend it to others. Participants raised concerns about the process of identity verification and appeared to have little experience with sharing health information online.

Conclusions: Applying online, dynamic approaches to address the consent challenges raised by biobanks with legacy sample collections should be explored, given the positive reaction to our pilot test and the strong preference for active consent. Balancing security and privacy with accessibility and ease of use will continue to be a challenge.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
Private Access Consent Simulation
Fig 1
Fig 1
Private Access Consent Simulation
Fig 2
Fig 2
Private Access Consent Preferences Matrix
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Tarini BA, Goldenberg A, Singer D, Clark SJ, Butchart A, Davis MM. Not without my permission: Parents' willingness to permit use of newborn screening samples for research. Public Health Genomics. 2010;13(3):125–30. doi:10.1159/000228724. - PubMed
    1. Tarini BA. Storage and use of residual newborn screening blood spots: A public policy emergency. Genet Med. 2011;13(7):619–20. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Carmichael M. Newborn screening: A spot of trouble. Nature. 2011;475(7355):156–158. doi:10.1038/475156a. - PubMed
    1. Rothwell E, Anderson R, Botkin J. Policy issues and stakeholder concerns regarding the storage and use of residual newborn dried blood samples for research. PPNP. 2010;11(1):5–12. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Caplan A. What No One Knows Cannot Hurt You: The Limits of Informed Consent in the Emerging World of Biobanking. In: Solbakk JH, Holm S, Hofmann B, editors. The Ethics of Research Biobanking. Springer; London: 2009. pp. 25–32.

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources