Olfactory function in Wave 2 of the National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project
- PMID: 25360014
- PMCID: PMC4303099
- DOI: 10.1093/geronb/gbu093
Olfactory function in Wave 2 of the National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the sense of smell, including sensitivity and odor identification, and characterize the U.S. national prevalence of olfactory dysfunction in older adults, thereby facilitating further investigation of the substantial risks for older adults associated with this basic sensory ability.
Method: The sense of smell was evaluated using the Olfactory Function Field Exam (OFFE), a measure designed specifically for field research, which assesses 3 components of olfaction: sensitivity to n-butanol (a standard testing odorant) and androstadienone (AND, a key social odor produced by humans), as well as the ability to identify odors. Respondents were randomly selected from the National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project Wave 2 sample to receive the OFFE (n = 2,304), and 2,212 consented to participate.
Results: In the U.S. population aged 62-90, n-butanol detection ability was significantly worse at older ages (ordinal logistic regression, p < .001); however, there was no difference in detection ability between genders (p = .60). AND detection ability was also significantly worse at older ages (p = .003), but in contrast to n-butanol, women outperformed men (p = .001). As expected, odor identification ability was worse in older people than in younger (p < .001), and women were more accurate than men (p = .001).
Discussion: We report for the first time 3 facets of olfactory function and its association with age and gender in a representative sample of U.S. older adults. Future analyses of these data are needed to elucidate the sense of smell's role in physical, social, and mental health with aging.
Keywords: Aging; Androstadienone; Odor identification; Olfaction.; n-Butanol.
© The Author 2014. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Figures
References
-
- Aschenbrenner K., Hummel C., Teszmer K., Krone F., Ishimaru T., Seo H. S., Hummel T. (2008). The influence of olfactory loss on dietary behaviors. The Laryngoscope, 118, 135–144. 10.1097/MLG.0b013e318155a4b9 - PubMed
-
- Atanasova B., Graux J., El Hage W., Hommet C., Camus V., Belzung C. (2008). Olfaction: A potential cognitive marker of psychiatric disorders. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 32, 1315–1325. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.05.003 - PubMed
-
- Barresi M., Ciurleo R., Giacoppo S., Foti Cuzzola V., Celi D., Bramanti P., Marino S. (2012). Evaluation of olfactory dysfunction in neurodegenerative diseases. Journal of the Neurological Sciences, 323, 16–24. 10.1016/j.jns.2012.08.028 - PubMed
-
- Bensafi M., Brown W. M., Khan R., Levenson B., Sobel N. (2004). Sniffing human sex-steroid derived compounds modulates mood, memory and autonomic nervous system function in specific behavioral contexts. Behavioural Brain Research, 152, 11–22. 10.1016/j.bbr.2003.09.009 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
